Nijs Jo, Roussel Nathalie, Paul van Wilgen C, Köke Albère, Smeets Rob
Chronic Pain and Chronic Fatigue Research Group (CHROPIVER), Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium.
Man Ther. 2013 Apr;18(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
It is well established that the biomedical model falls short in explaining chronic musculoskeletal pain. Although many musculoskeletal therapists have moved on in their thinking and apply a broad biopsychosocial view with regard to chronic pain disorders, the majority of clinicians have received a biomedical-focused training/education. Such a biomedical training is likely to influence the therapists' attitudes and core beliefs toward chronic musculoskeletal pain. Therapists should be aware of the impact of their own attitudes and beliefs on the patient's attitudes and beliefs. As patient's attitudes and beliefs influence treatment adherence, musculoskeletal therapists should be aware that focusing on the biomedical model for chronic musculoskeletal pain is likely to result in poor compliance with evidence based treatment guidelines, less treatment adherence and a poorer treatment outcome. Here, we provide clinicians with a 5-step approach toward effective and evidence-based care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The starting point entails self-reflection: musculoskeletal therapists can easily self-assess their attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain. Once the therapist holds evidence-based attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain, assessing patients' attitudes and beliefs will be the natural next step. Such information can be integrated in the clinical reasoning process, which in turn results in individually-tailored treatment programs that specifically address the patients' attitudes and beliefs in order to improve treatment adherence and outcome.
众所周知,生物医学模式在解释慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛方面存在不足。尽管许多肌肉骨骼治疗师已经转变了思维方式,对慢性疼痛障碍采用了广泛的生物心理社会观点,但大多数临床医生接受的是以生物医学为重点的培训/教育。这种生物医学培训可能会影响治疗师对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的态度和核心信念。治疗师应该意识到自己的态度和信念对患者态度和信念的影响。由于患者的态度和信念会影响治疗依从性,肌肉骨骼治疗师应该意识到,专注于慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的生物医学模式可能会导致对循证治疗指南的依从性差、治疗依从性降低以及治疗效果不佳。在此,我们为临床医生提供一种针对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的有效循证护理的五步方法。起点是自我反思:肌肉骨骼治疗师可以轻松地自我评估他们对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的态度和信念。一旦治疗师对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛持有循证态度和信念,评估患者的态度和信念将是自然而然的下一步。这些信息可以整合到临床推理过程中,进而产生针对患者态度和信念量身定制的治疗方案,以提高治疗依从性和治疗效果。