Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201 Sec. 2 Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Jan;39(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
Molecular identification methods based on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) genotype are more reliable than clinical risk factors and demographic data for differentiating community-acquired and healthcare-associated (HCA) meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, patients with community-onset (CO) MRSA infections, defined as a culture-positive sample obtained <48h after admission and from patients with HCA risk factors, have been infrequently studied. This study compared the clinical profiles of different SCCmec genotypes in this group of patients. From 2004 to 2008, the clinical profiles of 122 non-repetitive patients with CO-MRSA infections at a tertiary medical centre in Taiwan were retrospectively recorded and the molecular characteristics of the isolates were examined. The proportion of SCCmec IV/V genotypes increased from 9.5% to 35.3% from 2004 to 2008. There were no differences in demographic data, underlying diseases, invasive procedures or outcomes between the SCCmec II/III and IV/V groups, except that patients with SCCmec II/III genotypes tended to have more HCA risk factors (3.1 vs. 2.4; P=0.008). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that having at least four HCA risk factors was independently associated with SCCmec II/III. The sensitivity of recovering SCCmec IV/V genotypes from patients with less than four HCA risk factors was 89.3%. This study revealed the emergence of SCCmec IV/V genotypes in CO-MRSA infections. Although the clinical characteristic boundaries between SCCmec II/III and IV/V diminished, having at least four HCA risk factors made the presence of SCCmec IV/V genotypes less likely in patients with CO-MRSA infections.
基于葡萄球菌盒式染色体 mec(SCCmec)基因型的分子鉴定方法比临床危险因素和人口统计学数据更能可靠地区分社区获得性和医疗保健相关性(HCA)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。然而,对于社区发病(CO)MRSA 感染患者,即入院后 48 小时内培养阳性且具有 HCA 危险因素的患者,其研究相对较少。本研究比较了该组患者不同 SCCmec 基因型的临床特征。2004 年至 2008 年,回顾性记录了台湾一家三级医疗中心的 122 例非重复 CO-MRSA 感染患者的临床特征,并对分离株的分子特征进行了检测。2004 年至 2008 年,SCCmec IV/V 基因型的比例从 9.5%增加到 35.3%。SCCmec II/III 和 IV/V 两组在人口统计学数据、基础疾病、侵入性操作或结局方面无差异,除了 SCCmec II/III 基因型患者的 HCA 危险因素更多(3.1 比 2.4;P=0.008)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,至少有四个 HCA 危险因素与 SCCmec II/III 独立相关。从 HCA 危险因素少于四个的患者中分离 SCCmec IV/V 基因型的敏感性为 89.3%。本研究揭示了 CO-MRSA 感染中 SCCmec IV/V 基因型的出现。尽管 SCCmec II/III 和 IV/V 两组的临床特征界限有所缩小,但至少有四个 HCA 危险因素使 CO-MRSA 感染患者 SCCmec IV/V 基因型的出现可能性降低。