• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

校准预测模型估计值以支持个性化医疗。

Calibrating predictive model estimates to support personalized medicine.

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):263-74. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000291. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000291
PMID:21984587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3277613/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Predictive models that generate individualized estimates for medically relevant outcomes are playing increasing roles in clinical care and translational research. However, current methods for calibrating these estimates lose valuable information. Our goal is to develop a new calibration method to conserve as much information as possible, and would compare favorably to existing methods in terms of important performance measures: discrimination and calibration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We propose an adaptive technique that utilizes individualized confidence intervals (CIs) to calibrate predictions. We evaluate this new method, adaptive calibration of predictions (ACP), in artificial and real-world medical classification problems, in terms of areas under the ROC curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, mean squared error, and computational complexity.

RESULTS

ACP compared favorably to other calibration methods such as binning, Platt scaling, and isotonic regression. In several experiments, binning, isotonic regression, and Platt scaling failed to improve the calibration of a logistic regression model, whereas ACP consistently improved the calibration while maintaining the same discrimination or even improving it in some experiments. In addition, the ACP algorithm is not computationally expensive.

LIMITATIONS

The calculation of CIs for individual predictions may be cumbersome for certain predictive models. ACP is not completely parameter-free: the length of the CI employed may affect its results.

CONCLUSIONS

ACP can generate estimates that may be more suitable for individualized predictions than estimates that are calibrated using existing methods. Further studies are necessary to explore the limitations of ACP.

摘要

目的

生成针对医学相关结果的个体化估计的预测模型在临床护理和转化研究中发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,目前校准这些估计值的方法会丢失有价值的信息。我们的目标是开发一种新的校准方法,以尽可能多地保留信息,并在重要的性能指标(区分度和校准度)方面优于现有方法。

材料和方法

我们提出了一种利用个体化置信区间(CI)来校准预测的自适应技术。我们在人工和真实世界的医学分类问题中评估了这种新方法,即预测自适应校准(ACP),评估指标包括 ROC 曲线下面积、Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验、均方误差和计算复杂度。

结果

ACP 与其他校准方法(如分箱、Platt 缩放和单调回归)相比表现良好。在几个实验中,分箱、单调回归和 Platt 缩放未能改善逻辑回归模型的校准,而 ACP 则始终在保持相同区分度的情况下改善了校准,甚至在某些实验中还提高了区分度。此外,ACP 算法的计算复杂度不高。

局限性

对于某些预测模型,为个体预测计算 CI 可能很麻烦。ACP 并非完全无参数:所使用的 CI 长度可能会影响其结果。

结论

ACP 可以生成比使用现有方法校准的估计值更适合个体化预测的估计值。需要进一步研究来探索 ACP 的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/e35ab616d145/amiajnl-2011-000291fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/16be92aa1e5d/amiajnl-2011-000291fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/7caaa540cf61/amiajnl-2011-000291fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/14c251cbf740/amiajnl-2011-000291fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/c825aa116c18/amiajnl-2011-000291fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/38b8dc8e8f3e/amiajnl-2011-000291fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/1fbd1701dd4e/amiajnl-2011-000291fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/270e196d71bb/amiajnl-2011-000291fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/0ce5eb7b0ac3/amiajnl-2011-000291fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/e35ab616d145/amiajnl-2011-000291fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/16be92aa1e5d/amiajnl-2011-000291fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/7caaa540cf61/amiajnl-2011-000291fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/14c251cbf740/amiajnl-2011-000291fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/c825aa116c18/amiajnl-2011-000291fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/38b8dc8e8f3e/amiajnl-2011-000291fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/1fbd1701dd4e/amiajnl-2011-000291fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/270e196d71bb/amiajnl-2011-000291fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/0ce5eb7b0ac3/amiajnl-2011-000291fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd8/3277613/e35ab616d145/amiajnl-2011-000291fig9.jpg

相似文献

1
Calibrating predictive model estimates to support personalized medicine.校准预测模型估计值以支持个性化医疗。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):263-74. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000291. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
Beyond discrimination: A comparison of calibration methods and clinical usefulness of predictive models of readmission risk.超越歧视:再入院风险预测模型的校准方法和临床实用性比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Dec;76:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Calibrating predictive model estimates in a distributed network of patient data.在患者数据分布式网络中校准预测模型估计值。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 May;117:103758. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103758. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Probability calibration-based prediction of recurrence rate in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.基于概率校准的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者复发率预测
BioData Min. 2021 Aug 13;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13040-021-00272-9.
5
Computerized prediction of intensive care unit discharge after cardiac surgery: development and validation of a Gaussian processes model.计算机预测心脏手术后重症监护病房出院:高斯过程模型的开发和验证。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Oct 25;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-64.
6
A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.关于评估二元和分类预测模型的校准技术的讨论。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Jan 1;149:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
A patient-driven adaptive prediction technique to improve personalized risk estimation for clinical decision support.一种基于患者驱动的自适应预测技术,用于提高临床决策支持的个性化风险估计。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e137-44. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000751. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.评估大样本中逻辑回归模型的拟合优度:Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验的改进。
Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):549-560. doi: 10.1111/biom.13249. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学中死亡风险预测模型的辨别与校准
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Oct;38(5):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.007. Epub 2005 Mar 26.
10
Comparison of Scaling Methods to Obtain Calibrated Probabilities of Activity for Protein-Ligand Predictions.比较用于获得蛋白质-配体预测的校准活性概率的定标方法。
J Chem Inf Model. 2020 Oct 26;60(10):4546-4559. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00476. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying uncert-AI-nty: Testing the accuracy of LLMs' confidence judgments.量化不确定性:测试大语言模型置信度判断的准确性。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01755-4.
2
Construction and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Predicting Tubal Pregnancy Rupture Based on Nomogram.基于列线图的输卵管妊娠破裂临床预测模型的构建与验证
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):300-309. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-01980-y. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
A Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Informing Student Admission Decisions.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factor modification and projections of absolute breast cancer risk.风险因素的改变和绝对乳腺癌风险的预测。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 6;103(13):1037-48. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr172. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
The application of naive Bayes model averaging to predict Alzheimer's disease from genome-wide data.朴素贝叶斯模型平均在全基因组数据预测阿尔茨海默病中的应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):370-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000101.
3
2010 translational bioinformatics year in review.2010 年转化生物信息学年评
一种基于机器学习的方法来辅助学生录取决策。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;15(3):330. doi: 10.3390/bs15030330.
4
Advancing Glaucoma Diagnosis: Employing Confidence-Calibrated Label Smoothing Loss for Model Calibration.青光眼诊断进展:采用置信度校准标签平滑损失进行模型校准
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Jun 22;4(6):100555. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100555. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
5
Density regression and uncertainty quantification with Bayesian deep noise neural networks.基于贝叶斯深度噪声神经网络的密度回归与不确定性量化
Stat. 2023 Jan-Dec;12(1). doi: 10.1002/sta4.604. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Improved prediction of clinical pregnancy using artificial intelligence with enhanced inner cell mass and trophectoderm images.利用增强的内细胞团和滋养层图像的人工智能技术提高临床妊娠预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):3240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52241-x.
7
Deep-learning-based prognostic modeling for incident heart failure in patients with diabetes using electronic health records: A retrospective cohort study.基于深度学习的电子健康记录中糖尿病患者新发心力衰竭的预后建模:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0281878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281878. eCollection 2023.
8
Calibrated bagging deep learning for image semantic segmentation: A case study on COVID-19 chest X-ray image.校准袋式深度学习在图像语义分割中的应用:以 COVID-19 胸片图像为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276250. eCollection 2022.
9
Open questions and research gaps for monitoring and updating AI-enabled tools in clinical settings.临床环境中监测和更新人工智能工具的开放性问题与研究空白。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Sep 2;4:958284. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.958284. eCollection 2022.
10
Development of CNN models for the enteral feeding tube positioning assessment on a small scale data set.用于小数据集上肠内喂养管定位评估的卷积神经网络模型的开发
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00766-w.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):358-66. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000328.
4
Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.出院后微生物学结果返回并需要随访的发生率和预测因素。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.895.
5
Translational bioinformatics: linking knowledge across biological and clinical realms.转化生物信息学:连接生物和临床领域的知识。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000245. Epub 2011 May 10.
6
Breast cancer risk estimation with artificial neural networks revisited: discrimination and calibration.基于人工神经网络的乳腺癌风险估计:判别与校准。
Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;116(14):3310-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25081.
7
Early identification of cardiovascular risk using genomics and proteomics.利用基因组学和蛋白质组学早期识别心血管风险。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010 Jun;7(6):309-17. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.53. Epub 2010 May 4.
8
Breast cancer: risk assessment and prevention.乳腺癌:风险评估与预防
South Med J. 2010 Apr;103(4):333-8. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181d39038.
9
Improving calibration of logistic regression models by local estimates.通过局部估计改进逻辑回归模型的校准
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:535-9.
10
Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.评估重症监护中死亡率基准的校准:重新审视霍斯默-莱梅肖检验。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep;35(9):2052-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275267.64078.B0.