• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌症的动态对比增强 MRI:感兴趣区选择对药代动力学参数的个体内和个体间变异性的影响。

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: the impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.059. Epub 2011 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.059
PMID:21985945
Abstract

PURPOSE

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-extracted parameters measure tumor microvascular physiology and are usually calculated from an intratumor region of interest (ROI). Optimal ROI delineation is not established. The valid clinical use of DCE-MRI requires that the variation for any given parameter measured within a tumor be less than that observed between tumors in different patients. This work evaluates the impact of tumor ROI selection on the assessment of intra- and interpatient variability.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Head and neck cancer patients received initial targeted therapy (TT) treatment with erlotinib and/or bevacizumab, followed by radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin with synchronous TT. DCE-MRI data from Baseline and the end of the TT regimen (Lead-In) were analyzed to generate the vascular transfer function (K(trans)), the extracellular volume fraction (v(e)), and the initial area under the concentration time curve (iAUC(1 min)). Four ROI sampling strategies were used: whole tumor or lymph node (Whole), the slice containing the most enhancing voxels (SliceMax), three slices centered in SliceMax (Partial), and the 5% most enhancing contiguous voxels within SliceMax (95Max). The average coefficient of variation (aCV) was calculated to establish intrapatient variability among ROI sets and interpatient variability for each ROI type. The average ratio between each intrapatient CV and the interpatient CV was calculated (aRCV).

RESULTS

Baseline primary/nodes aRCVs for different ROIs not including 95Max were, for all three MR parameters, in the range of 0.14-0.24, with Lead-In values between 0.09 and 0.2, meaning a low intrapatient vs. interpatient variation. For 95Max, intrapatient CVs approximated interpatient CVs, meaning similar data dispersion and higher aRCVs (0.6-1.27 for baseline) and 0.54-0.95 for Lead-In.

CONCLUSION

Distinction between different patient's primary tumors and/or nodes cannot be made using 95Max ROIs. The other three strategies are viable and equivalent for using DCE-MRI to measure head and neck cancer physiology.

摘要

目的

动态对比增强(DCE)MRI 提取的参数可测量肿瘤微血管生理学,通常是从肿瘤内感兴趣区(ROI)计算得出。目前尚未确定最佳 ROI 勾画方法。DCE-MRI 的临床有效应用要求,在给定肿瘤内测量的任何参数的变化小于不同患者之间肿瘤之间的变化。本研究评估了肿瘤 ROI 选择对评估患者内和患者间变异性的影响。

方法和材料

头颈部癌症患者接受初始靶向治疗(TT)治疗,包括厄洛替尼和/或贝伐单抗,随后进行放疗和同期顺铂同步 TT。对基线和 TT 方案结束时(导入期)的 DCE-MRI 数据进行分析,以生成血管传递函数(K(trans))、细胞外容积分数(v(e))和初始浓度时间曲线下面积(iAUC(1 min))。使用了四种 ROI 采样策略:整个肿瘤或淋巴结(整体)、包含最多增强体素的切片(SliceMax)、位于 SliceMax 中心的三个切片(部分)和 SliceMax 内的 5%最增强连续体素(95Max)。计算平均变异系数(aCV)以建立不同 ROI 集之间的患者内变异性和每种 ROI 类型的患者间变异性。计算每个患者内 CV 与患者间 CV 之间的平均比值(aRCV)。

结果

不同 ROI (不包括 95Max)的基线原发/淋巴结的所有三个 MR 参数的 aRCV 均在 0.14-0.24 之间,而导入期值在 0.09 和 0.2 之间,这意味着患者内与患者间的变化较小。对于 95Max,患者内 CV 接近患者间 CV,意味着数据分散相似,aRCV 更高(基线为 0.6-1.27),导入期为 0.54-0.95。

结论

不能使用 95Max ROI 区分不同患者的原发肿瘤和/或淋巴结。其他三种策略可用于使用 DCE-MRI 测量头颈部癌症生理学,是可行且等效的。

相似文献

1
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: the impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters.头颈部癌症的动态对比增强 MRI:感兴趣区选择对药代动力学参数的个体内和个体间变异性的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):e345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.059. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
2
Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.志愿者研究中通过肾脏动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)得出的主动脉输入函数(AIF)的可重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
3
Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI in head and neck cancer patients: variability of the precontrast longitudinal relaxation time (T10).头部和颈部癌症患者的动态对比增强 MRI:预对比纵向弛豫时间(T10)的可变性。
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2683-92. doi: 10.1118/1.3427487.
4
GPU-accelerated nonparametric kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.基于 GPU 的胶质母细胞瘤患者贝伐单抗治疗的 DCE-MRI 数据的非参数动力学分析。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;31(4):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Reproducibility of perfusion parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of lung and liver tumors: effect on estimates of patient sample size in clinical trials and on individual patient responses.肺和肝肿瘤动态对比增强 MRI 灌注参数的可重复性:对临床试验中患者样本量估计和个体患者反应的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):W134-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3116.
6
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.肾细胞癌的动态对比增强磁共振成像测量:感兴趣区大小和定位对观察者间及观察者内变异性的影响。
Invest Radiol. 2015 Jan;50(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000096.
7
Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症动态对比增强磁共振成像的综合人群平均动脉输入函数。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 1;89(3):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.006.
8
Limitations of single slice dynamic contrast enhanced MR in pharmacokinetic modeling of bone sarcomas.单层动态对比增强磁共振成像在骨肉瘤药代动力学建模中的局限性
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jun;50(5):512-20. doi: 10.1080/02841850902922761.
9
Gadolinium-enhanced echo-planar T2-weighted MRI of tumors in the extracranial head and neck: feasibility study and preliminary results using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic analysis.钆增强的回波平面T2加权磁共振成像用于颅外头颈部肿瘤:使用分布参数示踪剂动力学分析的可行性研究及初步结果
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):963-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21311.
10
An exploratory study into the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI metrics as predictors of response in head and neck cancers.一项探索性研究,旨在探讨动态对比增强(DCE)MRI 指标作为头颈部癌症反应预测因子的作用。
Clin Radiol. 2012 Sep;67(9):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility study for the automatic surgical planning method based on statistical model.基于统计模型的自动手术规划方法的可行性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 1;18(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03870-x.
2
Improving liver tumor image contrast and synthesizing novel tissue contrasts by adaptive multiparametric MRI fusion.通过自适应多参数磁共振成像融合改善肝脏肿瘤图像对比度并合成新型组织对比度。
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep;6(3):190-198. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1167. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of ADC measurements in esophageal carcinoma primary tumors.
食管癌原发肿瘤中表观扩散系数(ADC)测量的观察者间及观察者内可重复性
Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 6;8(54):92880-92889. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21639. eCollection 2017 Nov 3.
4
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI to Predict Local Recurrence After Radiosurgery on Spinal Metastases.一项评估动态对比增强灌注磁共振成像用于预测脊柱转移瘤放射外科治疗后局部复发的初步研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;16(6):857-865. doi: 10.1177/1533034617705715. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?复杂的动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)模型是否得到临床数据的支持?
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Mar;77(3):1329-1339. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26189. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
6
Characterizing Heterogeneity within Head and Neck Lesions Using Cluster Analysis of Multi-Parametric MRI Data.利用多参数MRI数据的聚类分析表征头颈部病变的异质性
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 23;10(9):e0138545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138545. eCollection 2015.
7
An approach to identify, from DCE MRI, significant subvolumes of tumors related to outcomes in advanced head-and-neck cancer.一种从动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE MRI)中识别与晚期头颈癌预后相关的肿瘤重要亚体积的方法。
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):5277-85. doi: 10.1118/1.4737022.