Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):711-22. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A114.
To test the efficacy of sequential application of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treatment of de novo coronary lesions, comparing the sequence of application (DCB first vs. BMS first).
In a multicentre pilot trial, 26 patients with de novo coronary lesions were randomised to receive a paclitaxel-coated balloon application followed by BMS implantation (DCB first) or vice versa (BMS first). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed post-procedure and at six months, with OCT % neointimal volume obstruction as primary endpoint. Longitudinal geographical miss was only observed in DCB first (23.1 vs. 0.0%, p=0.220). Implantation of BMS first resulted in fewer malapposed struts (p=0.013) but similar coverage at six months. No significant difference was found regarding the primary endpoint (25.5 vs. 24.9%, p=0.922), mean thickness of coverage (261 vs. 225 µm, p=0.763), late loss (0.53 vs. 0.45 mm, p=0.833), binary restenosis (27.3 vs. 16.7% in-segment, p=0.640) or clinical endpoints.
Sequential application of DCB and not pre-mounted BMS for treatment of de novo coronary lesions results in efficient inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia. The sequence of application (DCB first vs. BMS first) does not seem to influence the outcome, except for better apposition in BMS first.
测试药物涂层球囊(DCB)和裸金属支架(BMS)序贯应用治疗新发冠状动脉病变的疗效,比较应用顺序(先 DCB 还是先 BMS)。
在一项多中心试点试验中,26 例新发冠状动脉病变患者被随机分为紫杉醇涂层球囊应用后植入 BMS(先 DCB)或反之(先 BMS)。术后和 6 个月时进行定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT),以 OCT %新生内膜体积闭塞为主要终点。仅在先 DCB 时观察到纵向地理性缺失(23.1%与 0.0%,p=0.220)。先植入 BMS 导致贴壁不良的支架更少(p=0.013),但 6 个月时的覆盖率相似。主要终点(25.5%与 24.9%,p=0.922)、平均覆盖率厚度(261 µm 与 225 µm,p=0.763)、晚期丢失(0.53 mm 与 0.45 mm,p=0.833)、节段内二元再狭窄(27.3%与 16.7%,p=0.640)或临床终点均无显著差异。
对于新发冠状动脉病变,先 DCB 而不是预装载 BMS 的序贯应用可有效抑制新生内膜增生。应用顺序(先 DCB 还是先 BMS)似乎不会影响结果,除了先 BMS 时的贴壁更好。