Suppr超能文献

用于骨折预测的“起立行走”测试和骨密度测量。

"'Timed up and go' test and bone mineral density measurement for fracture prediction.

作者信息

Zhu Kun, Devine Amanda, Lewis Joshua R, Dhaliwal Satvinder S, Prince Richard L

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 10;171(18):1655-61. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.434.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two major factors associated with skeletal fracture in older persons are intrinsic bone strength and risk of falling. This study examined the role of Timed Up and Go (TUG) test performance, a validated predictor of falling, and hip areal bone mineral density (BMD), a validated predictor of bone strength in fracture prediction in a 10-year longitudinal study.

METHODS

The study participants were 1126 women (mean [SD] age at baseline, 75.0 [2.6] years) living in Perth, Western Australia. Assessments included TUG test at baseline and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total hip areal BMD measurement at year 1. Incident clinical osteoporotic fracture over 10 years was confirmed by radiographic records. Complete incident hip fracture data were obtained from a hospital morbidity database.

RESULTS

One-third (32.7%) of participants had slow TUG test performance (>10.2 seconds), and 54.2% of participants had low hip areal BMD (T-score of less than -1). Relative to risks among participants having normal TUG test performance and normal BMD, risks of nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture were significantly higher among participants who had slow TUG test performance and normal hip BMD (nonvertebral fracture hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; hip fracture HR, 2.48) or both slow TUG test performance and low hip BMD (nonvertebral fracture HR, 2.51; hip fracture HR, 4.68). For nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture, the population-attributable risks of slow TUG test performance with normal hip BMD were 19.3% and 32.3%, of normal TUG test performance with low hip BMD were 31.3% and 50.3%, and of both slow TUG test performance and low hip BMD were 30.1% and 55.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TUG test performance is an independent risk factor for incident nonvertebral fracture and a feasible inexpensive physical performance assessment for use in clinical practice to screen patients with increased risk of fracture.

摘要

背景

老年人骨骼骨折相关的两个主要因素是内在骨强度和跌倒风险。本研究在一项为期10年的纵向研究中,检验了定时起立行走(TUG)测试表现(一种经过验证的跌倒预测指标)和髋部面积骨密度(BMD)(一种经过验证的骨折预测中骨强度的指标)在骨折预测中的作用。

方法

研究参与者为1126名居住在西澳大利亚珀斯的女性(基线时平均[标准差]年龄为75.0[2.6]岁)。评估包括基线时的TUG测试以及第1年时双能X线吸收法测量的全髋部面积骨密度。通过影像学记录确认10年内发生的临床骨质疏松性骨折。完整的髋部骨折事件数据来自医院发病率数据库。

结果

三分之一(32.7%)的参与者TUG测试表现缓慢(>10.2秒),54.2%的参与者髋部面积骨密度较低(T值小于-1)。与TUG测试表现正常且骨密度正常的参与者相比,TUG测试表现缓慢但髋部骨密度正常的参与者(非椎体骨折风险比[HR]为1.84;髋部骨折HR为2.48)或TUG测试表现缓慢且髋部骨密度较低的参与者(非椎体骨折HR为2.51;髋部骨折HR为4.68)发生非椎体骨折和髋部骨折的风险显著更高。对于非椎体骨折和髋部骨折,髋部骨密度正常但TUG测试表现缓慢的人群归因风险分别为19.3%和32.3%,髋部骨密度较低但TUG测试表现正常的人群归因风险分别为31.3%和50.3%,TUG测试表现缓慢且髋部骨密度较低的人群归因风险分别为30.1%和55.9%。

结论

TUG测试表现是发生非椎体骨折的独立危险因素,是一种可行且廉价的身体功能评估方法,可用于临床实践中筛查骨折风险增加的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验