Suppr超能文献

同伴教育者有作用吗?赞比亚学校中学生主导的艾滋病预防模式评价。

Do peer educators make a difference? An evaluation of a youth-led HIV prevention model in Zambian Schools.

机构信息

Behavioral.iomedical Research, Family Health International, Durham, NC 27713, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):237-47. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr093. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

Abstract

Restless Development's youth-led model places trained Volunteer Peer Educators (VPEs), aged 18-25 years, in schools to teach HIV prevention and reproductive health (RH). VPEs also run youth centers, extracurricular and community-based activities. This evaluation assesses (i) program effects on students' HIV/RH knowledge, attitudes and behaviors using a non-randomized quasi-experimental design among 2133 eighth and ninth grade students in 13 intervention versus 13 matched comparison schools and (ii) program costs. Intervention students had significantly higher levels of knowledge related to HIV [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.19; P < 0.01] and RH (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.21-2.49; P < 0.01), more positive attitudes toward people living with HIV and greater self-efficacy to refuse unwanted sex and access condoms. No evidence of differences in ever having had sex was found (28% in the intervention; 29% in the comparison schools). However, intervention students were more likely not to have had sex in the previous year (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56; P < 0.05) and to have had only one sex partner ever (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.00-2.03; P < 0.05). The average annual cost of the program was US$21 per beneficiary. In conclusion, the youth-led model is associated with increased HIV and RH knowledge and self-efficacy and lowered levels of stigma and sexual risk-taking behaviors.

摘要

不安分发展公司的青年主导模式在学校中部署经过培训的志愿同伴教育者(VPE),年龄在 18-25 岁之间,以教授艾滋病毒预防和生殖健康(RH)知识。VPE 还经营青年中心,开展课外和社区活动。本评估使用非随机准实验设计,在 13 所干预学校和 13 所匹配对照学校的 2133 名八年级和九年级学生中,评估了(i)该项目对学生艾滋病毒/RH 知识、态度和行为的影响,以及(ii)项目成本。与对照学校相比,干预学校的学生在艾滋病毒相关知识方面的水平显著更高[比值比(OR)1.61,95%置信区间(CI)1.18-2.19;P < 0.01]和 RH 知识(OR 1.71;95% CI 1.21-2.49;P < 0.01)、对艾滋病毒感染者的态度更为积极、拒绝非意愿性行为和获得安全套的自我效能感更强。没有发现有过性行为的学生存在差异(干预组 28%,对照组 29%)。然而,干预组的学生在前一年没有性行为的可能性更高(OR 1.26,95% CI 1.03-1.56;P < 0.05),且曾经有过的性伴侣数量也更少(OR 1.43,95% CI 1.00-2.03;P < 0.05)。该项目的年均成本为每位受益人 21 美元。总之,青年主导模式与增加艾滋病毒和 RH 知识和自我效能感以及降低污名化和性风险行为有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验