Edriss A S, Mesták J
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005 Dec 31;18(4):202-10.
Scar management for the prevention of excessive scar formation has always been important but never so important as it is today. Optimal management continues to be an enigma for surgeons, and the best modality of treatment has been debated for many years. However, most studies have unfortunately been either retrospective or case report descriptions. Advances in scar management have been hampered by confusing or ambiguous terminology. There is no consensus on what amount of post-traumatic skin scar formation is "normal" and what should be considered "hypertrophic". In the World Health Organization's ICD-9, there is no diagnostic code for hypertrophic scar - only keloid is listed. Yet the medical and scientific literature distinguishes them as different conditions. This confusion results in inappropriate management of scar formation, and occasionally contributes to decision making related to elective or cosmetic surgery. Our experience suggests that there is no single treatment for scars that is adequate and that clinical judgement is very important when considering treatment and balancing the potential benefits of the various treatments available. The goal of treating scars is to restore functionality, provide relief of symptoms, enhance cosmetics, and prevent recurrence. This article is based on our scientific and clinical experiences and focuses on over-the-counter options to manage keloid and hypertrophic scars.
预防过度瘢痕形成的瘢痕管理一直都很重要,但从未像现在这样重要。对于外科医生来说,最佳管理仍然是一个谜,并且最佳治疗方式多年来一直存在争议。然而,遗憾的是,大多数研究要么是回顾性的,要么是病例报告描述。瘢痕管理的进展受到混淆或模糊术语的阻碍。对于创伤后皮肤瘢痕形成的多少是“正常的”以及什么应被视为“肥厚性的”,没有达成共识。在世界卫生组织的《国际疾病分类第九版》(ICD - 9)中,没有肥厚性瘢痕的诊断代码——仅列出了瘢痕疙瘩。然而,医学和科学文献将它们区分为不同的病症。这种混淆导致瘢痕形成的管理不当,偶尔也会影响与择期手术或美容手术相关的决策。我们的经验表明,没有一种单一的瘢痕治疗方法是足够的,并且在考虑治疗以及权衡各种可用治疗方法的潜在益处时,临床判断非常重要。治疗瘢痕的目标是恢复功能、缓解症状、改善外观并防止复发。本文基于我们的科学和临床经验,重点关注用于管理瘢痕疙瘩和肥厚性瘢痕的非处方选择。