Suppr超能文献

使用塑料闪烁探测器提取硅二极管的深度相关微扰因子。

Extraction of depth-dependent perturbation factors for silicon diodes using a plastic scintillation detector.

机构信息

Département de Radio-Oncologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal , Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5441-7. doi: 10.1118/1.3637496.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This work presents the experimental extraction of the perturbation factor in megavoltage electron beams for three models of silicon diodes (IBA Dosimetry, EFD and SFD, and the PTW 60012 unshielded) using a plastic scintillation detector (PSD).

METHODS

The authors used a single scanning PSD mounted on a high-precision scanning tank to measure depth-dose curves in 6-, 12-, and 18-MeV clinical electron beams. They also measured depth-dose curves using the IBA Dosimetry, EFD and SFD, and the PTW 60012 unshielded diodes. The authors used the depth-dose curves measured with the PSD as a perturbation-free reference to extract the perturbation factors of the diodes.

RESULTS

The authors found that the perturbation factors for the diodes increased substantially with depth, especially for low-energy electron beams. The experimental results show the same trend as published Monte Carlo simulation results for the EFD diode; however, the perturbations measured experimentally were greater. They found that using an effective point of measurement (EPOM) placed slightly away from the source reduced the variation of perturbation factors with depth and that the optimal EPOM appears to be energy dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

The manufacturer recommended EPOM appears to be incorrect at low electron energy (6 MeV). In addition, the perturbation factors for diodes may be greater than predicted by Monte Carlo simulations.

摘要

目的

本工作使用塑料闪烁探测器(PSD)从三个硅二极管模型(IBA 剂量计、EFD 和 SFD 以及未屏蔽的 PTW 60012)中提取兆伏电子束的微扰因子。

方法

作者使用单个扫描 PSD 安装在高精度扫描罐上,以测量 6、12 和 18 MeV 临床电子束的深度剂量曲线。他们还使用 IBA 剂量计、EFD 和 SFD 以及未屏蔽的 PTW 60012 二极管测量深度剂量曲线。作者使用 PSD 测量的深度剂量曲线作为无微扰参考,提取二极管的微扰因子。

结果

作者发现,二极管的微扰因子随深度显著增加,特别是对于低能电子束。实验结果与 EFD 二极管的发布蒙特卡罗模拟结果呈现相同趋势;然而,实验测量的微扰更大。他们发现,使用稍微远离源的有效测量点(EPOM)可以减少微扰因子随深度的变化,并且最佳 EPOM 似乎与能量有关。

结论

在低电子能量(6 MeV)时,制造商推荐的 EPOM 似乎不正确。此外,二极管的微扰因子可能大于蒙特卡罗模拟预测的值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验