Suppr超能文献

重新审视公众对基因检测的态度:比较 2002 年和 2010 年的意见。

Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

机构信息

Section Community Genetics, Department of Clinical Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Aug;21(8):793-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.271. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Abstract

Ten years after the Human Genome Project, medicine is still waiting for many of the promised benefits, and experts have tempered their high expectations. Public opinion on genetic testing has generally been favourable but is this still the case? The aim of this study is to compare public experiences, beliefs and expectations concerning genetic testing over the years (2002 vs 2010). A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted using the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in 2002 and 2010. Responses to questions in identical wording were compared. In 2002 and 2010, 817 (63%) and 978 (70%) members responded, respectively. Awareness and reported use of genetic tests remained stable over time. In 2010, more respondents expected genetic testing to become more widely applied, believed that knowledge about the genetic background of disease helps people live longer, and that testing should be promoted more intensively. In 2010, they were also more interested in their own genetic make-up. On the one hand, the concern that a dichotomy would emerge between people with 'good genes' and 'bad genes' was higher. On the other hand, respondents thought that insurance companies would be less likely to demand a genetic test in order to calculate health insurance premiums. In conclusion, the results suggest that in 8 years, expectations of benefits and potential use of genetic testing have been raised among the public, resulting in more positive opinions. Worries on inequity remain, although worries about premium differentiation by insurance companies have decreased.

摘要

人类基因组计划实施 10 年后,医学仍然在等待许多承诺的好处,专家们也降低了他们的高期望。公众对基因检测的看法总体上是积极的,但情况仍然如此吗?本研究旨在比较多年来(2002 年与 2010 年)公众对基因检测的经验、信念和期望。2002 年和 2010 年,使用荷兰医疗保健消费者小组进行了横断面问卷调查。比较了相同措辞问题的回答。2002 年和 2010 年,分别有 817 名(63%)和 978 名(70%)成员做出了回应。基因检测的知晓率和报告使用率多年来保持稳定。2010 年,更多的受访者预计基因检测将得到更广泛的应用,认为了解疾病的遗传背景有助于人们长寿,应该更积极地推广检测。2010 年,他们对自己的基因构成也更感兴趣。一方面,人们更担心会出现“好基因”和“坏基因”人群之间的二分法。另一方面,受访者认为保险公司不太可能要求进行基因检测来计算健康保险费。总之,结果表明,在 8 年内,公众对基因检测的益处和潜在用途的期望有所提高,这导致了更积极的观点。对不公平的担忧仍然存在,尽管保险公司对保费差异化的担忧有所减少。

相似文献

1
Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Aug;21(8):793-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.271. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
2
Public attitudes towards preventive genomics and personal interest in genetic testing to prevent disease: a survey study.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Oct;24(5):768-75. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt143. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):3-10. doi: 10.1080/15265160902928209.
8
Public attitudes in Japan toward participation in whole genome sequencing studies.
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 13;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0153-7.
10
Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
4
Moral judgment of genetic technologies: validation of the genetic technologies questionnaire in the German-speaking population.
Front Genet. 2025 Aug 1;16:1620962. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1620962. eCollection 2025.
5
Acceptance and attitudes towards genetic cancer testing among German general practice patients: a cross-sectional survey.
Fam Med Community Health. 2025 Jul 31;13(3):e003395. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003395.
8
The genetic technologies questionnaire in the Greek-speaking population: the moral judgement of the lay public.
Front Genet. 2025 May 13;16:1594724. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1594724. eCollection 2025.
9
Clinical Practice, Challenges, and the Future of Ophthalmic Genetics in Saudi Arabia.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2025 Apr 2;20:1-8. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v20.15890. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

2
Science and the sources of hype.
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(3-4):209-17. doi: 10.1159/000336533. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Trends in U.S. Attitudes Toward Genetic Testing, 1990-2004.
Public Opin Q. 2008 Fall;72(3):446-458. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn033. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
4
Public optimism towards nanomedicine.
Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:3473-85. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S26340. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
5
Envisioning emerging nanotechnologies: a three-year panel study of South Carolina citizens.
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1718-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01705.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
6
Genetic screening.
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):148-64. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr008. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
7
Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market.
J Community Genet. 2010 Sep;1(3):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s12687-010-0023-z. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
8
Genomics. Deflating the genomic bubble.
Science. 2011 Feb 18;331(6019):861-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1198039.
10
The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Feb;29(2):113-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1771.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验