• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万维网上消费者健康文档的可靠性及类型:一项注释研究。

Reliability and type of consumer health documents on the World Wide Web: an annotation study.

作者信息

Martin Melanie J

机构信息

Computer Science Department, California State University, Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock California, 95382, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Semantics. 2011;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-2-S3-S5. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1186/2041-1480-2-S3-S5
PMID:21992703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3194177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this paper we present a detailed scheme for annotating medical web pages designed for health care consumers. The annotation is along two axes: first, by reliability (the extent to which the medical information on the page can be trusted), second, by the type of page (patient leaflet, commercial, link, medical article, testimonial, or support).

RESULTS

We analyze inter-rater agreement among three judges for each axis. Inter-rater agreement was moderate (0.77 accuracy, 0.62 F-measure, 0.49 Kappa) on the page reliability axis and good (0.81 accuracy, 0.72 F-measure, 0.73 Kappa) along the page type axis.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown promising results in this study that appropriate classes of pages can be developed and used by human annotators to annotate web pages with reasonable to good agreement.

AVAILABILITY

No.

摘要

背景

在本文中,我们提出了一个详细的方案,用于注释面向医疗保健消费者的医学网页。注释沿着两个轴进行:第一,按可靠性(页面上医学信息可被信任的程度);第二,按页面类型(患者传单、商业、链接、医学文章、推荐或支持)。

结果

我们分析了三位评判者在每个轴上的评分者间一致性。在页面可靠性轴上,评分者间一致性为中等(准确率0.77,F值0.62,卡帕值0.49),在页面类型轴上为良好(准确率0.81,F值0.72,卡帕值0.73)。

结论

我们在本研究中展示了有前景的结果,即人类注释者可以开发并使用合适的页面类别,以合理到良好的一致性来注释网页。

可用性

无。

相似文献

1
Reliability and type of consumer health documents on the World Wide Web: an annotation study.万维网上消费者健康文档的可靠性及类型:一项注释研究。
J Biomed Semantics. 2011;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-2-S3-S5. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet.在谷歌上搜索子宫内膜异位症:对互联网上可用信息的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):451-458.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1007. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
3
Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features.儿童急诊评估的评价者间信度:生理和临床特征。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Feb;106(2):149-153. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Inter-rater agreement for the annotation of neurologic signs and symptoms in electronic health records.电子健康记录中神经体征和症状标注的评分者间一致性。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Jun 13;5:1075771. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1075771. eCollection 2023.
5
Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children.网络上的家长:儿童咳嗽质量管理的风险
Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e1. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.e1.
6
A framework for enhancing spatial and temporal granularity in report-based health surveillance systems.基于报告的健康监测系统中增强时空粒度的框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Jan 12;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-1.
7
Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.互联网上以患者为导向的甲氨蝶呤信息网站:完整性、准确性、格式、可靠性、可信度和可读性综述
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):41-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080430.
8
Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of Tongue Coating Diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Using Smartphones: Quasi-Delphi Study.智能手机中医舌诊诊断的观察者内和观察者间可靠性:准德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 9;8(7):e16018. doi: 10.2196/16018.
9
Quality evaluation of JAMA Patient Pages on diabetes using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patient (EQIP) tool.使用 Ensuring Quality Information for Patient (EQIP) 工具对 JAMA 患者页面上的糖尿病相关内容进行质量评估。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa.化脓性汗腺炎结局评估工具和分期系统的评价者间信度和可靠性。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;181(3):483-491. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17716. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Louhi 2010: Special issue on Text and Data Mining of Health Documents.卢希2010年:健康文档文本与数据挖掘特刊。
J Biomed Semantics. 2011;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):I1. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-2-S3-I1. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.使用 DISCERN 工具评估慢性疼痛网站上健康信息的质量和变异性。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 12;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-59.
2
Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval.信息检索中的一致性、F值与可靠性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):296-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1733. Epub 2005 Jan 31.
3
Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.评估万维网上面向消费者的健康信息质量的实证研究:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
4
Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet: a study of indicators relating to information for managing fever in children in the home.互联网上消费者健康信息的准确性指标:一项关于家庭中儿童发热管理信息相关指标的研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):73-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2002.0090073.
5
Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web.筛选网页的质量指标:一种在万维网上查找高质量消费者健康信息的实证方法。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:911-5.
6
Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home.万维网上面向公众的健康信息的可靠性:关于儿童居家发热处理建议的系统调查
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875.