Translational Tobacco Reduction Research Program, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center and Prevention Research Center, Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Dec;13(12):1284-95. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr183. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (i.e., sexual minority) populations have higher smoking prevalence than their heterosexual peers, but there is a lack of empirical study into why such disparities exist. This secondary analysis of data sought to examine associations of discrimination and violence victimization with cigarette smoking within sexual orientation groups.
Data from the Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 National College Health Assessments were truncated to respondents of 18-24 years of age (n = 92,470). Since heterosexuals comprised over 90% of respondents, a random 5% subsample of heterosexuals was drawn, creating a total analytic sample of 11,046. Smoking status (i.e., never-, ever-, and current smoker) was regressed on general (e.g., not sexual orientation-specific) measures of past-year victimization and discrimination. To examine within-group differences, two sets of multivariate ordered logistic regression analyses were conducted: one set of models stratified by sexual orientation and another set stratified by gender-by-sexual-orientation groups.
Sexual minorities indicated more experiences of violence victimization and discrimination when compared with their heterosexual counterparts and had nearly twice the current smoking prevalence of heterosexuals. After adjusting for age and race, lesbians/gays who were in physical fights or were physically assaulted had higher proportional odds of being current smokers when compared with their lesbian/gay counterparts who did not experience those stressors.
When possible, lesbian/gay and bisexual groups should be analyzed separately, as analyses revealed that bisexuals had a higher risk profile than lesbians/gays. Further research is needed with more nuanced measures of smoking (e.g., intensity), as well as examining if victimization may interact with smoking cessation.
女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(即性少数群体)的吸烟率高于其异性恋同龄人,但对于为什么存在这种差异,缺乏实证研究。本研究对数据进行了二次分析,旨在探讨性取向群体中歧视和暴力受害与吸烟之间的关联。
从 2008 年秋季和 2009 年春季的国家大学生健康评估中截取了 18-24 岁的受访者的数据(n=92470)。由于异性恋者占受访者的 90%以上,因此从异性恋者中抽取了一个随机的 5%的子样本,创建了一个包含 11046 人的总分析样本。吸烟状况(即从不吸烟、曾经吸烟和现在吸烟)与过去一年的一般(例如非特定于性取向的)受害和歧视进行回归分析。为了检查组内差异,进行了两组多变量有序逻辑回归分析:一组按性取向分层的模型和另一组按性别-性取向群体分层的模型。
与异性恋者相比,性少数群体报告了更多的暴力受害和歧视经历,并且现在吸烟的比例几乎是异性恋者的两倍。在调整年龄和种族后,与没有经历过这些压力源的同性恋/双性恋者相比,曾经参与过身体打架或被人身攻击的同性恋/双性恋者现在吸烟的比例更高。
当可能时,应该分别分析同性恋/双性恋和双性恋群体,因为分析显示双性恋者的风险状况高于同性恋/双性恋者。需要进行更多具有更细微的吸烟(例如强度)衡量指标的进一步研究,并研究受害是否可能与戒烟相互作用。