University of Twente, Department of Health, Psychology and Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):1163-73. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002042.
BACKGROUND. Although there is substantial evidence for the efficacy of life review therapy as an early treatment of depression in later life, its effectiveness in natural settings has not been studied. The present study evaluates an intervention based on life review and narrative therapy in a large multi-site, pragmatic randomized controlled trial(RCT). METHOD. Life review therapy was compared with care as usual. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms;secondary outcomes were anxiety symptoms, positive mental health, quality of life, and current major depressive episode (MDE). To identify groups for whom the intervention was particularly effective, moderator analyses were carried out (on sociodemographic variables, personality traits, reminiscence functions, clinically relevant depressive and anxiety symptoms, and past MDEs). RESULTS. Compared with care as usual (n=102), life review therapy (n=100) was effective in reducing depressive symptoms, at post-treatment (d=0.60, B= -5.3, p<0.001), at 3-month follow-up (d=0.50, B= -5.0, p<0.001) and for the intervention also at 9-month follow-up (t=5.7, p<0.001). The likelihood of a clinically significant change in depressive symptoms was significantly higher [odds ratio (OR) 3.77, p<0.001 at post-treatment ; OR 3.76, p<0.001 at the 3-month follow-up]. Small significant effects were found for symptoms of anxiety and positive mental health.Moderator analyses showed only two significant moderators, the personality trait of extraversion and the reminiscence function of boredom reduction. CONCLUSIONS. This study shows the effectiveness of life review therapy as an early intervention for depression in an ecologically valid context, supporting its applicability to a broad target group. The intervention is also effective in reducing anxiety symptoms and strengthening positive mental health.
虽然有大量证据表明生活回顾疗法作为老年人早期治疗抑郁症的有效性,但它在自然环境中的效果尚未得到研究。本研究在一项大型多地点、实用随机对照试验(RCT)中评估了一种基于生活回顾和叙事疗法的干预措施。
生活回顾疗法与常规护理进行比较。主要结果是抑郁症状;次要结果是焦虑症状、积极心理健康、生活质量和当前主要抑郁发作(MDE)。为了确定干预对哪些人群特别有效,进行了调节分析(社会人口统计学变量、人格特质、回忆功能、与临床相关的抑郁和焦虑症状以及过去的 MDE)。
与常规护理(n=102)相比,生活回顾疗法(n=100)在治疗后(d=0.60,B=-5.3,p<0.001)、3 个月随访时(d=0.50,B=-5.0,p<0.001)以及干预的 9 个月随访时(t=5.7,p<0.001)有效降低了抑郁症状。抑郁症状有临床显著变化的可能性显著增加[治疗后优势比(OR)为 3.77,p<0.001;3 个月随访时 OR 为 3.76,p<0.001]。焦虑症状和积极心理健康也有小的显著效果。调节分析显示,只有两个显著的调节因素,即外向人格特质和减少无聊回忆功能。
本研究表明,生活回顾疗法作为一种在生态有效的环境中治疗抑郁症的早期干预措施是有效的,支持其适用于广泛的目标群体。该干预措施还能有效减轻焦虑症状和增强积极心理健康。