Fukui T
Department of General Medicine, Saga Medical School, Nabeshima.
Rinsho Byori. 1990 May;38(5):582-6.
Medical decision making, an application of decision sciences to medicine, has been increasingly recognized as an important clinical armamentarium in the past several decades. Clinical medicine abounds in uncertainties arising from the very nature of clinical data and physicians' judgments. These uncertainties provide room for decision sciences to be widely used in clinical medicine. There are two major research areas in medical decision making, i.e., prescriptive and descriptive approaches. The prescriptive approach, an endeavor to explore how decisions should be made, is quantitative and probabilistic, and employs decision analytical procedures which are designed to maximize expected value or utility. An example of a decision tree is shown as well as such essential technical terms as decision node, chance node, averaging out, folding back, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, Bayes' theorem, and expected value of clinical information. The descriptive approach, on the other hand, is related to how people behave. In this context, strict meaning of judgment and decision making, some heuristics and psychological pitfalls, and the necessity of elucidating patients' preferences, though difficult, are recapitulated.
医学决策作为决策科学在医学领域的应用,在过去几十年里日益被视为一项重要的临床手段。临床医学中,由于临床数据的本质和医生的判断,存在着大量不确定性。这些不确定性为决策科学在临床医学中的广泛应用提供了空间。医学决策有两个主要研究领域,即规范性方法和描述性方法。规范性方法致力于探索应如何做出决策,它是定量的和概率性的,并采用旨在使预期价值或效用最大化的决策分析程序。文中展示了一个决策树的示例以及一些关键技术术语,如决策节点、机会节点、求平均值、反向推导、敏感性、特异性、预测值、贝叶斯定理和临床信息的预期价值。另一方面,描述性方法涉及人们的行为方式。在此背景下,总结了判断和决策的严格含义、一些启发式方法和心理陷阱,以及阐明患者偏好的必要性,尽管这很困难。