Suppr超能文献

比较玻璃体内单独使用贝伐单抗或联合曲安奈德与曲安奈德治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(2):100-6. doi: 10.1159/000331935. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab alone (IVB) or combined with triamcinolone (IVB/IVT) versus triamcinolone (IVT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

In this randomized three-arm clinical trial, eligible eyes were assigned randomly to one of the three study arms: the IVB group, 2 injections of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab with 6-week intervals; the IVB/IVT group, 1.25 mg of IVB with 2 mg of IVT, and the IVT group, 2 mg of IVT. The clinical course of best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness by optical coherence tomography was monitored for up to 12 months after the initial injection.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven eyes of 105 patients with DME completed 12 months of follow-up. The IVB/IVT group and the IVT group showed better visual acuity and reduced central macular thickness at 6 weeks and 3 months, compared with the IVB group (p = 0.041, p = 0.02 at 6 weeks; p = 0.045, p = 0.043 at 3 months, respectively). However, no significant difference in visual acuity and central macular thickness was observed between the three groups at 12 months (p = 0.088, p = 0.132, respectively). The frequency of retreatment was lower in the IVB/IVT and IVT groups during the 12-month period (p < 0.001). No significant differences in visual acuity or central macular thickness were observed between the IVB/IVT and IVT groups during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

IVB/IVT and IVT showed more pronounced effects during the earlier postinjection period. However, levels of visual acuity or central macular thickness at 12 months were comparable in the three study groups. No beneficial effect of the combination injection was observed.

摘要

目的

比较玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(IVB)单独治疗与联合曲安奈德(IVB/IVT)治疗或单纯曲安奈德(IVT)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者的效果。

方法

在这项随机三臂临床试验中,符合条件的眼随机分配到三个研究组之一:IVB 组,每 6 周注射 2 次 1.25mg 贝伐单抗;IVB/IVT 组,注射 1.25mg 贝伐单抗和 2mg 曲安奈德;IVT 组,注射 2mg 曲安奈德。通过光学相干断层扫描监测最佳矫正视力和中央黄斑厚度的临床病程,最长随访 12 个月。

结果

105 例 DME 患者的 111 只眼完成了 12 个月的随访。与 IVB 组相比,IVB/IVT 组和 IVT 组在 6 周和 3 个月时视力更好,中央黄斑厚度更低(p=0.041,p=0.02 于 6 周;p=0.045,p=0.043 于 3 个月)。然而,三组在 12 个月时视力和中央黄斑厚度无显著差异(p=0.088,p=0.132)。在 12 个月期间,IVB/IVT 组和 IVT 组的再治疗频率较低(p<0.001)。在随访期间,IVB/IVT 组和 IVT 组的视力或中央黄斑厚度无显著差异。

结论

IVB/IVT 和 IVT 在注射后早期效果更明显。然而,三组在 12 个月时的视力或中央黄斑厚度水平相当。联合注射没有观察到有益效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验