• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用助听器效益简表评估电声刺激的主观效益。

Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.

作者信息

Gstoettner Wolfgang K, Van de Heyning Paul, O'Connor Alec Fitzgerald, Kiefer Jan, Morera Constantino, Sainz Manuel, Vermeire Katrien, McDonald Sonelle, Cavallé Laura, Valdecasas Juan García, Adunka Oliver F, Baumann Uwe, Kleine-Punte Andrea, Brockmeier Hanna, Anderson Ilona, Helbig Silke

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, AKH Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(6):321-9. doi: 10.1159/000331917. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1159/000331917
PMID:21997337
Abstract

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) significantly decreases the subjective impairment in speech perception.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the subjective benefit of EAS over the first 12 months after EAS fitting using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB).

METHOD

Twenty-three EAS users, implanted with either the PULSAR(CI)(100) FLEX(EAS) provided with the DUET EAS processor or the COMBI40+ Medium provided with the TEMPO+ speech processor, were included. Electric stimulation was activated about 1 month postoperatively; ipsilateral acoustic stimulation was added 2 months thereafter. EAS benefit was measured preoperatively with only a hearing aid and postoperatively at EAS fitting and then 3, 6 and 12 months after EAS fitting using the APHAB.

RESULTS

Subjects reported significant improvements in the global score with a mean decrease in impairment from 74% preoperatively to 45% after 3 months of EAS use. Furthermore, clinical relevance was demonstrated in multiple subscales between preoperative and first fitting reflecting a true benefit of EAS with a probability of 95%.

摘要

结论

本研究表明,电声刺激(EAS)能显著降低言语感知方面的主观障碍。

目的

使用助听器受益简表(APHAB)评估电声刺激(EAS)装置佩戴后头12个月内的主观获益情况。

方法

纳入23名EAS使用者,他们植入的装置要么是配备DUET EAS处理器的PULSAR(CI)(100) FLEX(EAS),要么是配备TEMPO+言语处理器的COMBI40+ Medium。术后约1个月开启电刺激;此后2个月添加同侧声刺激。术前仅使用助听器测量EAS获益情况,术后在EAS装置佩戴时测量,然后在EAS装置佩戴后3个月、6个月和12个月使用APHAB进行测量。

结果

受试者报告整体得分有显著改善,使用EAS 3个月后,损伤平均从术前的74%降至45%。此外,术前与首次装置佩戴之间多个分量表显示出临床相关性,这反映了EAS具有真实的益处,概率为95%。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.使用助听器效益简表评估电声刺激的主观效益。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(6):321-9. doi: 10.1159/000331917. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.一种用于电刺激和声刺激的新型组合式言语处理器——八个月的使用经验
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70(6):359-65. doi: 10.1159/000163031. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
3
Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.使用FLEX(EAS)电极阵列,将电声联合刺激与PULSARCI(100)植入系统相结合。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;131(6):585-95. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.544327. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
4
Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.电声刺激中的音高匹配心理测量学。
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):656-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821a4800.
5
[The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].[使用自我评估问卷评估助听器效果]
Pro Fono. 2004 Jan-Apr;16(1):101-10.
6
The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.不同言语处理器和助听器设置对电声刺激患者言语感知结果的影响。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jan;29(1):76-86. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d6326.
7
Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.双侧电声刺激:部分和深度耳蜗电极插入的比较。一项纵向病例研究。
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:144-152. doi: 10.1159/000262606. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
8
Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.噪声环境下的言语感知:混合电-声刺激使用者的指向性麦克风的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):e0213251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213251. eCollection 2019.
9
Long-term follow-up of hearing preservation in electric-acoustic stimulation patients.电声刺激患者听力保留的长期随访
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1765-72. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000538.
10
Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.成人使用助听器仅获得边际效益时的人工耳蜗植入:一项欧洲研究。
Am J Otol. 1998 Sep;19(5):591-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation.人工耳蜗植入中使用中阶电极的听力保留结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Mar;37(3):235-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000963.
2
[The impact of cochlear implants on the quality of life of patients with single-sided deafness].[人工耳蜗对单侧耳聋患者生活质量的影响]
HNO. 2015 Mar;63(3):182-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2969-3.
3
A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.电声刺激的系统评价:设备适配范围、结果及临床适配实践
Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):3-26. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480857.