Fleig V, Brenck F, Wolff M, Weigand M A
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin, Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2011 Oct;60(10):963-74. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1942-8.
Scoring systems are used in all diagnostic areas of medicine. Several parameters are evaluated and rated with points according to their value in order to simplify a complex clinical situation with a score. The application ranges from the classification of disease severity through determining the number of staff for the intensive care unit (ICU) to the evaluation of new therapies under study conditions. Since the introduction of scoring systems in the 1980's a variety of different score models has been developed. The scoring systems that are employed in intensive care and are discussed in this article can be categorized into prognostic scores, expenses scores and disease-specific scores. Since the introduction of compulsory recording of two scoring systems for accounting in the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, these tools have gained more importance for all intensive care physicians. Problems remain in the valid calculation of scores and interpretation of the results.
评分系统应用于医学的所有诊断领域。根据几个参数的价值对其进行评估并打分,以便用一个分数简化复杂的临床情况。其应用范围从疾病严重程度分类、确定重症监护病房(ICU)的医护人员数量到研究条件下新疗法的评估。自20世纪80年代引入评分系统以来,已经开发出了各种各样不同的评分模型。本文所讨论的用于重症监护的评分系统可分为预后评分、费用评分和疾病特异性评分。自从德国诊断相关分组(DRG)系统强制要求记录两种用于计费的评分系统以来,这些工具对所有重症监护医生来说变得更加重要。在分数的有效计算和结果解读方面仍然存在问题。