• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善重症创伤患者的风险调整:TRISS-SAPS评分

Improving risk adjustment in critically ill trauma patients: the TRISS-SAPS Score.

作者信息

Reiter Ana, Mauritz Walter, Jordan Barbara, Lang Thomas, Pölzl Alexandra, Pelinka Linda, Metnitz Philipp G H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):375-80. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000104016.78539.94.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000104016.78539.94
PMID:15345988
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test (a) the prognostic performance of TRISS and SAPS II scoring systems in a large sample of trauma patients admitted to Austrian ICUs, and (b) the hypothesis that the prognostic performance of TRISS could be improved by adding SAPS II.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter cohort study comprising 5,538 trauma patients out of 35,637 patients admitted to 31 ICUs in Austria over a 4-year period.

RESULTS

Separately, TRISS and SAPS II showed lack of calibration in the cohort of trauma patients. The database was then split into two equal samples, development and validation. Using the development sample, a new scoring system was developed, with vital status at hospital discharge as the dependent variable and TRISS and SAPS II as independent variables. The prognostic performance of the new TRISS-SAPS system was then assessed in the validation cohort: Both, discrimination (as shown by area under the ROC curve), and calibration (using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics) was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

We improved risk adjustment in critically ill trauma patients by combining TRISS and SAPS II. This new scoring system might aid in evaluating and comparing specialized trauma ICUs.

摘要

目的

(a) 在大量入住奥地利重症监护病房 (ICU) 的创伤患者样本中,测试创伤严重度特征评分(TRISS)和简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS II)系统的预后性能;(b) 检验以下假设,即通过加入 SAPS II 可改善 TRISS 的预后性能。

方法

前瞻性多中心队列研究,纳入奥地利 31 个 ICU 在 4 年期间收治的 35637 例患者中的 5538 例创伤患者。

结果

单独来看,TRISS 和 SAPS II 在创伤患者队列中均显示出校准不足。然后将数据库分为两个相等的样本,即开发样本和验证样本。使用开发样本,以出院时的生命状态作为因变量,TRISS 和 SAPS II 作为自变量,开发了一种新的评分系统。然后在验证队列中评估新的 TRISS-SAPS 系统的预后性能:判别能力(通过 ROC 曲线下面积显示)和校准(使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度统计量)均表现出色。

结论

我们通过结合 TRISS 和 SAPS II 改善了重症创伤患者的风险调整。这种新的评分系统可能有助于评估和比较专门的创伤 ICU。

相似文献

1
Improving risk adjustment in critically ill trauma patients: the TRISS-SAPS Score.改善重症创伤患者的风险调整:TRISS-SAPS评分
J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):375-80. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000104016.78539.94.
2
Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study.重症监护中的预后预测:一项前瞻性、多中心的葡萄牙研究结果。
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):177-86. doi: 10.1007/s001340050313.
3
Ratios of observed to expected mortality are affected by differences in case mix and quality of care.观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率的比值受病例组合和医疗质量差异的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1466-72. doi: 10.1007/s001340000638.
4
Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system.重症监护病房创伤患者预后的预测:急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)以及24小时重症监护病房(ICU)评分系统的多中心研究
J Trauma. 1999 Aug;47(2):324-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199908000-00017.
5
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
6
Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population.单中心人群中SAPS II和APACHE II严重程度评分系统的验证
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1779-85. doi: 10.1007/s001340000715.
7
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.
8
Predictive accuracy of severity scoring system: a prospective cohort study using APACHE III in a Korean intensive care unit.严重程度评分系统的预测准确性:一项在韩国重症监护病房使用APACHE III的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00062-7.
9
Performance of three prognostic models in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective study.三种预后模型在癌症重症患者中的表现:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1242-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01659-0. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
10
Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.使用每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SAPS)II 评分和住院死亡概率(LOD)评分的综合评分预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)超过72小时患者医院死亡率的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340100961.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care in low- and middle-income countries.开发一套质量指标集,以衡量和改善中低收入国家 ICU 护理质量。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;48(11):1551-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06818-7. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
Inter-rater reliability of the Abbreviated Injury Scale scores in patients with severe head injury shows good inter-rater agreement but variability between countries. An inter-country comparison study.严重头部损伤患者损伤严重程度分类评分的观察者间信度显示出较好的观察者间一致性,但国家间存在差异。一项国家间比较研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1183-1188. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02059-x. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
3
A scoping review of registry captured indicators for evaluating quality of critical care in ICU.
一项关于评估重症监护病房(ICU)重症护理质量的登记指标的范围综述。
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 5;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00556-6.
4
The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.老年创伤的发病率正在增加,比较不同的评分工具对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct 19;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00340-1.
5
Validation of trauma scales: ISS, NISS, RTS and TRISS for predicting mortality in a Colombian population.创伤评分的验证:用于预测哥伦比亚人群死亡率的损伤严重度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)、创伤评分(RTS)和创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Feb;27(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1892-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores.预测创伤性脑损伤患者的六个月死亡率:常见重症监护严重程度评分的效用
Crit Care. 2014 Apr 3;18(2):R60. doi: 10.1186/cc13814.
7
Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools.系统评价损伤严重程度评分工具的预测性能。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Sep 10;20:63. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-63.
8
[Scoring systems in intensive care medicine : principles, models, application and limits].[重症医学中的评分系统:原理、模型、应用及局限性]
Anaesthesist. 2011 Oct;60(10):963-74. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1942-8.
9
Development and validation of a risk-adjustment tool in acute asthma.急性哮喘风险调整工具的开发与验证
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1701-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00998.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
10
Revisiting the validity of APACHE II in the trauma ICU: improved risk stratification in critically injured adults.重新审视创伤 ICU 中 APACHE II 的有效性:严重创伤成年人的风险分层得到改善。
Injury. 2009 Sep;40(9):993-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Jun 16.