Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique Opérationnelle (ERRSO), Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des armées (IRBA), BP 20545, 83041 Toulon cedex 9, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jun;112(6):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2195-6. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
Preventive measures to reduce the risk of decompression sickness can involve several procedures such as oxygen breathing during in-water decompression. Theoretical predictions also suggest that brief periods of recompression during the course of decompression could be a method for controlling bubble formation. The aim of this study was to get clearer information about the effects of different experimental ascent profiles (EAPs) on bubble reduction, using pure oxygen or recompression during decompression for nitrox diving. Four EAPs were evaluated using bubble monitoring in a group of six military divers using Nitrox 40% O(2) breathing with a rebreather. For EAP 1 and 2, 100% O(2) was used for the end stage of decompression, with a 30% reduction of decompression time in EAP 1 and 50% in EAP 2, compared to the French navy standard schedule. For EAP 3 and 4, nitrox 40% O(2) was maintained throughout the decompression stage. EAP 3 is based on an air standard decompression schedule, whereas EAP 4 involved a brief period of recompression at the end of the stop. We found that EAP 1 significantly reduced bubble formation, whereas high bubble grades occurred with other EAPs. No statistical differences were observed in bubbles scores between EAP 3 and 4. One diver developed mild neurological symptoms after EAP 3. These results tend to demonstrate that the "oxygen window" plays a key role in the reduction of bubble production and that breathing pure oxygen during decompression stops is an optimal strategy to prevent decompression sickness for nitrox diving.
预防减压病的措施可能包括几种程序,例如在水中减压时吸氧。理论预测还表明,在减压过程中短暂的再压缩期可能是控制气泡形成的一种方法。本研究的目的是更清楚地了解不同实验上升剖面(EAP)对使用纯氧或再压缩减压时减少气泡的影响,用于氮氧潜水的再呼吸器。使用 40%氧氮混合气的 6 名军事潜水员的气泡监测评估了 4 种 EAP。对于 EAP1 和 2,在减压的末期使用 100%O2,与法国海军标准时间表相比,EAP1 中减压时间减少了 30%,EAP2 中减压时间减少了 50%。对于 EAP3 和 4,在整个减压阶段都使用 40%氧氮混合气。EAP3 基于空气标准减压时间表,而 EAP4 在停止时在末端进行短暂的再压缩。我们发现 EAP1 可显著减少气泡形成,而其他 EAP 则出现高气泡等级。EAP3 和 EAP4 之间的气泡评分无统计学差异。一名潜水员在 EAP3 后出现轻度神经症状。这些结果表明,“氧气窗口”在减少气泡生成中起着关键作用,并且在减压时呼吸纯氧是预防氮氧潜水减压病的最佳策略。