Suppr超能文献

基于 DNA 的粪便膳食分析:qPCR 和高通量测序方法的比较。

DNA-based faecal dietary analysis: a comparison of qPCR and high throughput sequencing approaches.

机构信息

Australian Wildlife Forensic Services and Ancient DNA Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025776. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Abstract

The genetic analysis of faecal material represents a relatively non-invasive way to study animal diet and has been widely adopted in ecological research. Due to the heterogeneous nature of faecal material the primary obstacle, common to all genetic approaches, is a means to dissect the constituent DNA sequences. Traditionally, bacterial cloning of PCR amplified products was employed; less common has been the use of species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Currently, with the advent of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) technologies and indexed primers it has become possible to conduct genetic audits of faecal material to a much greater depth than previously possible. To date, no studies have systematically compared the estimates obtained by HTS with that of qPCR. What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of each technique and how quantitative are deep-sequencing approaches that employ universal primers? Using the locally threatened Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) as a model organism, it is shown here that both qPCR and HTS techniques are highly correlated and produce strikingly similar quantitative estimates of fish DNA in faecal material, with no statistical difference. By designing four species-specific fish qPCR assays and comparing the data to the same four fish in the HTS data it was possible to directly compare the strengths and weaknesses of both techniques. To obtain reproducible quantitative data one of the key, and often overlooked, steps common to both approaches is ensuring that efficient DNA isolation methods are employed and that extracts are free of inhibitors. Taken together, the methodology chosen for long-term faecal monitoring programs is largely dependent on the complexity of the prey species present and the level of accuracy that is desired. Importantly, these methods should not be thought of as mutually exclusive, as the use of both HTS and qPCR in tandem will generate datasets with the highest fidelity.

摘要

粪便物质的基因分析代表了一种相对非侵入性的研究动物饮食的方法,已广泛应用于生态研究中。由于粪便物质的异质性,所有基因方法都面临的主要障碍是一种分离组成 DNA 序列的方法。传统上,采用细菌 PCR 扩增产物的克隆;较少采用的是物种特异性定量 PCR(qPCR)测定。目前,随着高通量测序(HTS)技术和索引引物的出现,对粪便物质进行遗传审计的可能性比以前大大增加。迄今为止,尚无研究系统比较 HTS 获得的估计值与 qPCR 的估计值。每种技术的相对优势和劣势是什么,以及使用通用引物的深度测序方法的定量程度如何?本研究以本地受威胁的小企鹅(Eudyptula minor)为模型生物,表明 qPCR 和 HTS 技术高度相关,对粪便物质中鱼类 DNA 的定量估计非常相似,无统计学差异。通过设计四个鱼类特异性 qPCR 测定,并将数据与 HTS 数据中的相同四个鱼类进行比较,就可以直接比较两种技术的优缺点。为了获得可重复的定量数据,两种方法都需要注意一个关键且经常被忽视的步骤,即确保采用高效的 DNA 分离方法,并且提取物中没有抑制剂。总之,长期粪便监测计划中选择的方法在很大程度上取决于存在的猎物物种的复杂性和所需的准确性水平。重要的是,不应将这些方法视为相互排斥的,因为同时使用 HTS 和 qPCR 将生成具有最高保真度的数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026e/3188572/a460121197a0/pone.0025776.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验