The Neuroscience Program, Baldwin-Wallace College, 275 Eastland Rd., Berea, OH, 44017, USA.
Brain Res. 2011 Nov 14;1423:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.033. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
A conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is acquired when an animal consumes a novel taste (CS) and then experiences the symptoms of poisoning (US). Following CTA training, animals will avoid the taste that was previously associated with malaise. This defensive reaction to a learned fear can be extinguished by repeated exposure to the CS alone (CS-only; CSO-EXT). However, following a latency period in which the CS is not presented, the CTA will spontaneously recover (SR). Through the use of an explicitly unpaired extinction procedure (EU-EXT) we have shown that we can speed up extinction and attenuate SR of the CTA. Here we compared and contrasted the ability of CSO and EU extinction procedures to affect c-Fos expression in the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Fluid-deprived Sprague-Dawley rats acquired a strong CTA [via 3 pairings of 0.3% oral saccharin (SAC; the CS) and 81mg/kg i.p. lithium chloride (LiCl; the US)] followed by extinction trials consisting of multiple exposures to either, (a) the CS every-other day (CSO-EXT), or (b) CS and US on alternate days (EU-EXT). A different group of rats did not receive multiple CS exposures and served as a "no extinction" (NE) control. Both extinction procedures resulted in ≥90% reacceptance of SAC (achieving asymptotic extinction). Some of the animals were sacrificed for c-Fos immunohistochemical analysis following asymptotic extinction. Other rats entered a 30-day latency period where they drank water only. These remaining animals were then tested for SR with a final exposure to SAC before being sacrificed for c-Fos immunohistochemistry. As reported previously, rats in the CS-only group exhibited a significant SR of the CTA. However, animals in the EU extinction group reached asymptotic extinction more rapidly than did CSO rats and they did not show SR of the CTA. As compared to rats that retained their CTA, both groups of extinguished rats showed suppression in the number of c-Fos-labeled neurons in all 4 longitudinal columns of the PAG. The number of c-Fos-labeled cells in the PAG was generally low but there was a reliable increase in c-Fos expression in dorsolateral PAG (dlPAG) following the SR test in the brains of rats that went through the EU-EXT procedure as compared with those that either went through the more-traditional CSO extinction procedure or experienced no extinction at all. The number of c-Fos-labeled neurons in the dlPAG was significantly correlated with the amount of SAC consumed at the SR test. Surprisingly, the brains of EU-extinguished rats and CSO extinguished rats did not differ in the number of c-Fos-labeled neurons in gustatory neocortex, medial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, or the central nucleus of the amygdala. Thus, behavioral differences in SR between the EU and CSO extinction animals were not represented by corresponding changes in the neural activity of several brain nuclei classically associated with extinction learning. However a detailed analysis of PAG c-Fos expression provided hints about some of the physiological changes evoked by these 2 extinction paradigms that produce very different behavioral outcomes. The findings are clinically relevant as we seek the development of treatments for deficits in fear extinction (e.g. PTSD, phobias).
条件性味觉厌恶(CTA)是在动物摄入新的味觉(CS)并随后经历中毒症状(US)时获得的。在 CTA 训练后,动物会避免与不适相关的味道。这种对习得性恐惧的防御反应可以通过单独重复暴露于 CS 来消除(CS 仅;CSO-EXT)。然而,在 CS 未呈现的潜伏期之后,CTA 将自发恢复(SR)。通过使用明确的未配对的灭绝程序(EU-EXT),我们已经表明,我们可以加快灭绝速度并减弱 CTA 的 SR。在这里,我们比较和对比了 CSO 和 EU 灭绝程序对periaqueductal 灰色(PAG)中 c-Fos 表达的影响。在口渴的 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠中,通过 3 对 0.3%口服蔗糖(SAC;CS)和 81mg/kg 腹腔注射氯化锂(LiCl;US)进行了强烈的 CTA [获得],然后进行了多次灭绝试验,包括:(a)每隔一天暴露于 CS(CSO-EXT),或(b)CS 和 US 交替暴露(EU-EXT)。另一组大鼠没有接受多次 CS 暴露,作为“无灭绝”(NE)对照。两种灭绝程序都导致 SAC 的再接受率≥90%(达到渐近灭绝)。一些动物在渐近灭绝后进行 c-Fos 免疫组织化学分析。其他大鼠进入 30 天潜伏期,只喝水。然后,这些剩余的动物在最后一次接触 SAC 后进行 SR 测试,然后进行 c-Fos 免疫组织化学测试。如前所述,CSO 组的大鼠表现出 CTA 的明显 SR。然而,在 EU 灭绝组中的动物比 CSO 大鼠更快地达到渐近灭绝,并且它们没有表现出 CTA 的 SR。与保留 CTA 的大鼠相比,两组灭绝的大鼠在 PAG 的所有 4 个纵列中均显示出 c-Fos 标记神经元数量的减少。PAG 中的 c-Fos 标记细胞数量通常较低,但在经过 EU-EXT 程序的大鼠的大脑中进行 SR 测试后,dlPAG(dorsolateral PAG)中的 c-Fos 表达有可靠增加,而经历过传统 CSO 灭绝程序的大鼠或根本没有灭绝的大鼠则没有。dlPAG 中的 c-Fos 标记神经元的数量与 SR 测试中消耗的 SAC 量呈显著相关。令人惊讶的是,EU 灭绝的大鼠和 CSO 灭绝的大鼠在味觉新皮质、内侧前额叶皮质、基底外侧杏仁核或杏仁核中央核中的 c-Fos 标记神经元数量没有差异。因此,EU 和 CSO 灭绝动物之间在 SR 方面的行为差异并没有反映在与灭绝学习相关的几个脑核中神经活动的相应变化。然而,对 PAG c-Fos 表达的详细分析提供了一些关于这两种灭绝范式引起的生理变化的线索,这些变化产生了非常不同的行为结果。这些发现与临床相关,因为我们正在寻求开发治疗恐惧灭绝缺陷(例如 PTSD、恐惧症)的方法。