• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过婴儿运动表现测试评估运动发育:早产儿与足月儿的比较。

Motor development evaluated by Test of Infant Motor Performance: comparison between preterm and full-term infants.

作者信息

Guimarães Carmen L N, Reinaux Cyda M, Botelho Ana C G, Lima Geisy M S, Cabral Filho José E

机构信息

Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Sep-Oct;15(5):357-62. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000021. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1590/s1413-35552011005000021
PMID:22002185
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the motor development of preterm infants whose gestational age had been corrected to 38-40 weeks with full term newborns using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP).

METHODS

The cross-sectional study compared preterm infants (PT group), with a gestational age at birth of 28-33 weeks, at an equivalent age to full term newborns (FT group), who were assessed up to 48 hours after birth. The assessments were performed between December 2008 and April 2009 in a hospital nationally recognized for premature infant care in the city of Recife, PE, Brazil. The sample consisted of 92 infants, 46 in each group. The test was administered at age 38-40 weeks (or equivalent age in the PT group).

RESULTS

In the 46 preterm infants studied, 26.1% were classified as atypical, while in the FT group 100% were classified as typical (p<0.001). Moreover, there was a significant difference in average raw TIMP score between the two groups, with the PT group being lower (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to TIMP performance, prematurity seems to be associated with impaired motor development.

摘要

目的

使用婴儿运动能力测试(TIMP)比较孕龄已校正至38 - 40周的早产儿与足月儿的运动发育情况。

方法

这项横断面研究比较了出生孕周为28 - 33周的早产儿(PT组)与足月儿(FT组),足月儿在出生后48小时内接受评估。评估于2008年12月至2009年4月在巴西伯南布哥州累西腓市一家全国公认的早产儿护理医院进行。样本包括92名婴儿,每组46名。测试在38 - 40周龄时(或PT组的等效年龄)进行。

结果

在所研究的46名早产儿中,26.1%被归类为非典型,而FT组100%被归类为典型(p<0.001)。此外,两组之间的TIMP原始平均得分存在显著差异,PT组得分较低(p<0.001)。

结论

根据TIMP表现,早产似乎与运动发育受损有关。

相似文献

1
Motor development evaluated by Test of Infant Motor Performance: comparison between preterm and full-term infants.通过婴儿运动表现测试评估运动发育:早产儿与足月儿的比较。
Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Sep-Oct;15(5):357-62. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000021. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
2
Late preterm infants' motor development until term age.晚期早产儿直至足月时的运动发育
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Jan 1;72(1):17-22. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(01)04.
3
Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) Performance of Greek Preterm Infants: Comparisons With Full-Term Infants of the Same Nationality and Impact of Prematurity-Related Morbidity Factors.希腊早产儿的艾伯塔婴儿运动量表(AIMS)表现:与同国籍足月儿的比较及早产相关发病因素的影响
Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):1102-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140494. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
4
Early gross motor development of preterm infants according to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.根据艾伯塔婴儿运动量表评估早产儿的早期粗大运动发育。
J Pediatr. 2006 Nov;149(5):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.07.025.
5
Unstable longitudinal motor performance in preterm infants from 6 to 24 months on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development--Second edition.不稳定的纵向运动表现,在 6 至 24 个月大的早产儿中,采用贝利婴幼儿发展量表第二版评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Characterization of the motor performance of newborns in a neonatal unit of tertiary level.三级新生儿病房中新生儿运动表现的特征分析
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Sep;62(6):553-560. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.553.
7
The effects of an early physical therapy intervention for very preterm, very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.早期物理治疗干预对极早产、极低出生体重儿的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005 Summer;17(2):107-19. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000163073.50852.58.
8
Differences in walking attainment ages between low-risk preterm and healthy full-term infants.低风险早产儿与健康足月儿在行走获得年龄上的差异。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Aug;70(8):593-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012000800007.
9
Motor performance of Indian preterm infants as compared to the US population on the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP).印度早产儿在婴儿运动表现测试(TIMP)上的运动表现与美国人口的比较。
Early Hum Dev. 2024 Aug;195:106056. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106056. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Pattern and rate of motor skill acquisition among preterm infants during the first four months corrected age.矫正年龄前四个月内早产儿运动技能获得的模式与速率
Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 Sep-Oct;14(5):396-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Motor and cognitive outcomes of neonates with low birth weight in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.巴西低出生体重儿的运动和认知结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023 Feb;81(2):186-200. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758866. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Developmental status of human immunodeficiency virus-exposed uninfected premature infants compared with premature infants who are human immunodeficiency virus unexposed and uninfected.与未接触人类免疫缺陷病毒且未感染的早产儿相比,接触人类免疫缺陷病毒但未感染的早产儿的发育状况。
S Afr J Physiother. 2020 Jun 18;76(1):1401. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1401. eCollection 2020.
3
[Analysis of the Test of Infant Motor Performance data from 642 infants with a postconceptual age of 38-58 weeks].
[对642名孕龄38至58周婴儿的婴儿运动表现测试数据的分析]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec;19(12):1252-1256. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.12.006.