Suppr超能文献

测力平台与两种用于测量老年人平衡能力的功能测试之间的关系。

Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly.

作者信息

Gil André W O, Oliveira Marcio R, Coelho Vinícius A, Carvalho Carlos E, Teixeira Denilson C, da Silva Rubens A

机构信息

Physical Therapy Department, Center for Biological Health Sciences, Universidade Norte do Paraná, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Nov-Dec;15(6):429-35. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000024. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical and laboratory methods have been developed to assess the different dimensions of postural control with the aim to increase the clinical relevance of decisions about balance deficit.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to correlate the force platform measurements with two functional tests used to evaluate balance in elderly.

METHODS

A total of 124 physically independent elderly volunteers participated in this study. Subjects performed the following three tests: 1) a traditional functional balance test, named the one-leg standing test, which measures the time in seconds at this position; 2) a functional agility/dynamic balance test, which quantifies the total time in seconds that a subject can stand up from a chair and move as quickly as possible around two cones; and 3) an unipodal balance test on a force platform.

RESULTS

The one-leg standing test yielded a mean of 12 seconds (SD=9 s), while the mean time observed in the functional agility/dynamic balance test was 26 seconds (SD=6 s). The correlations between the balance parameters of force platform and two functional tests varied between -0.28 and 0.20, which shows a weak association between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the idea that these functional tests do not necessarily furnish the same information regarding balance mechanisms as the force platform. This study contributes to the evaluation of balance in elderly and suggests that functional tests should be used with caution especially in regards to the purposes of the research and when conducting clinical assessments of the elderly.

摘要

背景

已开发出临床和实验室方法来评估姿势控制的不同维度,目的是提高关于平衡缺陷决策的临床相关性。

目的

本研究的目的是将力平台测量结果与用于评估老年人平衡的两项功能测试相关联。

方法

共有124名身体独立的老年志愿者参与了本研究。受试者进行了以下三项测试:1)一项传统的功能平衡测试,称为单腿站立测试,测量在此位置的时间(以秒为单位);2)一项功能敏捷性/动态平衡测试,量化受试者从椅子上站起来并尽快绕两个锥体移动的总时间(以秒为单位);3)在力平台上进行的单足平衡测试。

结果

单腿站立测试的平均时间为12秒(标准差=9秒),而功能敏捷性/动态平衡测试中观察到的平均时间为26秒(标准差=6秒)。力平台平衡参数与两项功能测试之间的相关性在-0.28至0.20之间变化,这表明它们之间的关联较弱。

结论

我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即这些功能测试不一定能提供与力平台相同的关于平衡机制的信息。本研究有助于评估老年人的平衡,并表明功能测试应谨慎使用,特别是在研究目的和对老年人进行临床评估时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验