Hur Sung Mo, Kim Sung Hoon, Lee Se Kyung, Kim Wan Wook, Choe Jun-Ho, Lee Jeong Eon, Kim Jung-Han, Nam Seok-Jin, Yang Jung-Hyun, Kim Jee Soo
Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Oct;21(5):e219-24. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182239989.
We developed the bilateral areolar approach (BAA) for less invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy to avoid scars on exposed areas. Here, we report our experience with the BAA technique and evaluate its feasibility through comparison with the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA).
From January 2009 to November 2009, 88 patients with benign tumors of any size or papillary thyroid microcarcinomas were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 50 patients underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy by BABA and 38 patients by BAA. The BAA technique was performed using one 11-mm port and three 5-mm ports through bilateral circumareolar incisions using flexible endoscopic instruments.
Comparing BAA with BABA, there were significant differences in the mean operation times [121.7 ± 24.5 vs. 102.6 ± 25 min for lobectomy (P<0.05) and 162.5 ± 36.1 vs. 131 ± 28 min for total thyroidectomy (P<0.05), respectively]. However, there were no significant differences in the duration of hospitalization, amount of drainage from the surgical sites, and occurrence of postoperative complications. Most of the patients after BAA and BABA were satisfied with the cosmetic result. However, among the patients who underwent the BABA procedure, 1 patient was dissatisfied and 2 patients experienced discomfort due to conspicuous axillary scar when they wore sleeveless clothes.
Endoscopic thyroidectomy using the BAA procedure affords the advantages of minimal invasiveness and excellent cosmesis compared with other approaches including BABA. The BAA procedure is an attractive surgical option, particularly for patients with benign thyroid disease or small-sized papillary carcinoma who want an excellent cosmetic outcome.
我们研发了双侧乳晕入路(BAA)用于微创内镜甲状腺切除术,以避免在暴露部位留下疤痕。在此,我们报告我们使用BAA技术的经验,并通过与双侧腋窝-乳房入路(BABA)比较来评估其可行性。
从2009年1月至2009年11月,88例患有任何大小的良性肿瘤或甲状腺微小乳头状癌的患者纳入本研究。其中,50例患者通过BABA接受内镜甲状腺切除术,38例患者通过BAA接受手术。BAA技术通过双侧乳晕周围切口使用一个11毫米端口和三个5毫米端口,借助可弯曲内镜器械进行。
将BAA与BABA比较,平均手术时间存在显著差异[叶切除术分别为121.7±24.5分钟对102.6±25分钟(P<0.05),全甲状腺切除术为162.5±36.1分钟对131±28分钟(P<0.05)]。然而,住院时间、手术部位引流量和术后并发症发生率方面无显著差异。BAA和BABA术后的大多数患者对美容效果满意。然而,在接受BABA手术的患者中,1例不满意,2例在穿无袖衣服时因明显的腋窝疤痕而感到不适。
与包括BABA在内的其他入路相比,使用BAA进行内镜甲状腺切除术具有微创和美容效果极佳的优点。BAA是一种有吸引力的手术选择,尤其对于希望获得极佳美容效果的良性甲状腺疾病或小尺寸乳头状癌患者。