Brennan J A, Meyers A D, Jafek B W
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver.
Am J Otolaryngol. 1990 May-Jun;11(3):191-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-0709(90)90037-v.
Penetrating neck trauma remains controversial: some trauma centers continue to pursue a policy of mandatory exploration while others advocate selective exploration. The literature regarding penetrating neck trauma published during the past 5 years is reviewed in this report. The majority of reports support selective exploration, and most civilian centers report a mortality of 3% to 6% regardless of the type of exploration performed. To clarify the rationale behind the selective management of penetrating neck wounds, current data on ballistics, ancillary diagnostic studies, and comparative costs are reviewed. Emergency room management and surgical follow-up, which vary according to the type of missile and the zone of the neck penetrated, are discussed.
一些创伤中心继续奉行强制探查政策,而其他中心则主张选择性探查。本报告回顾了过去5年发表的关于颈部穿透伤的文献。大多数报告支持选择性探查,并且大多数民用中心报告称,无论进行何种探查,死亡率均为3%至6%。为阐明颈部穿透伤选择性处理背后的基本原理,本文回顾了当前有关弹道学、辅助诊断研究及比较成本的数据。还讨论了根据导弹类型和颈部穿透区域不同而有所差异的急诊室处理和手术后续治疗。