• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有时在空间中迷失自我:儿童和成人自发使用多个空间参照系。

Sometimes losing your self in space: children's and adults' spontaneous use of multiple spatial reference frames.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2012 Jan;48(1):185-91. doi: 10.1037/a0025863. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1037/a0025863
PMID:22004339
Abstract

Two experiments tested 6- to 11-year-old children's and college students' use of different frames of reference when making judgments about descriptions of social and nonsocial scenes. In Experiment 1, when social and nonsocial scenes were mixed, both children and students (N = 144) showed spontaneous sensitivity to the intrinsic and the relative frame of reference for both social and nonsocial scenes. All groups over 7 years old showed a stronger effect of the intrinsic frame of reference for social stimuli. This is the first evidence of sensitivity to more than 1 frame of reference in individual judgments made by children. Experiment 2 tested a further sample of 6- to 11-year-old children and students (N = 185) with social and nonsocial scenes in separate blocks. In this study, participants were no longer sensitive to the relative frame of reference--an effect we characterize as "losing your self in space," as this frame is generated by one's own position in the world. Children showed this effect only when the stimuli were social, suggesting that spontaneous use of intrinsic frames of spatial reference may develop out of sensitivity to the perspectives of agents.

摘要

两项实验测试了 6 至 11 岁儿童和大学生在对社会和非社会场景描述进行判断时使用不同参照系的情况。在实验 1 中,当社会和非社会场景混合时,儿童和学生(N=144)都自发地对社会和非社会场景的内在和相对参照系敏感。所有 7 岁以上的群体对社会刺激的内在参照系的影响更强。这是首次在个体判断中证明对超过 1 个参照系的敏感性。实验 2 用社会和非社会场景分别在单独的块中测试了另外一组 6 至 11 岁的儿童和学生(N=185)。在这项研究中,参与者不再对相对参照系敏感——我们称之为“在空间中迷失自我”,因为这个参照系是由人在世界中的位置产生的。只有当刺激是社会性的时候,儿童才会表现出这种效果,这表明对主体视角的敏感性可能会自发地产生对内在空间参照系的使用。

相似文献

1
Sometimes losing your self in space: children's and adults' spontaneous use of multiple spatial reference frames.有时在空间中迷失自我:儿童和成人自发使用多个空间参照系。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Jan;48(1):185-91. doi: 10.1037/a0025863. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
2
Mother-child communication about location: giving and following directions for finding hidden objects.母婴关于地点的交流:给予和遵循指示以寻找隐藏的物体。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Jul;48(4):956-68. doi: 10.1037/a0026597. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
3
Developmental differences in giving directions: spatial frames of reference and mental rotation.指示方向的发展差异:空间参照系与心理旋转
Child Dev. 1993 Aug;64(4):1258-70.
4
Micro- and macroreference frames: Specifying the relations between spatial categories in memory.微观和宏观参照框架:在记忆中指定空间范畴之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):938-57. doi: 10.1037/a0019647.
5
Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: group differences and strategies.参考框架错位与基本方向判断:组间差异与策略
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Jun;10(2):75-88. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.75.
6
The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing.以自我为中心和以客体为中心的参照系与分类和坐标空间信息处理之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1138-56. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.539700. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness.什么算近呢?幼儿利用相对距离来判断远近。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):121-33. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.121.
8
Children's use of frames of reference in communication of spatial location.儿童在传达空间位置时对参照系的运用。
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1528-43.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
The developing visual system is not optimally sensitive to the spatial statistics of natural images.发育中的视觉系统对自然图像的空间统计特性并非具有最佳敏感性。
Vision Res. 2012 Aug 15;67:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasoning in social versus non-social domains and its relation to autistic traits.社会领域与非社会领域中的推理及其与自闭症特征的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov 19;78(9):17470218241296090. doi: 10.1177/17470218241296090.
2
Turn around to have a look? Spatial referencing in dorsal vs. frontal settings in cross-linguistic comparison.转过身去看看?跨语言比较中背侧与额侧环境下的空间参照。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 2;6:1283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01283. eCollection 2015.
3
The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking.
运用具身自我旋转进行视觉和空间视角转换。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 5;7:698. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00698. eCollection 2013.
4
The primacy of social over visual perspective-taking.社会视角采择优于视觉视角采择。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 10;7:558. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00558.
5
The bilocated mind: new perspectives on self-localization and self-identification.双重定位的心灵:自我定位和自我认同的新视角。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 8;7:71. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00071. eCollection 2013.