Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, 609 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012 Jan;11(1):207-15. doi: 10.1039/c1pp05232b. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
Mechanisms of UVA-mutagenesis remain a matter of debate. Earlier described higher rates of mutation formation per pyrimidine dimer with UVA than with UVB and other evidence suggested that a non-pyrimidine dimer-type of DNA damage contributes more to UVA- than to UVB-mutagenesis. However, more recently published data on the spectra of UVA-induced mutations in primary human skin cells and in mice suggest that pyrimidine dimers are the most common type of DNA damage-inducing mutations not only with UVB, but also with UVA. As this rebuts a prominent role of non-dimer type of DNA damage in UVA-mutagenesis, we hypothesized that the higher mutation rate at UVA-induced pyrimidine dimers, as compared to UVB-induced ones, is caused by differences in the way UVA- and UVB-exposed cells process DNA damage. Therefore, we here compared cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, and apoptosis in primary human fibroblasts following UVB- and UVA-irradiation, using the same physiologic and roughly equimutagenic doses (100-300 J m(-2) UVB, 100-300 kJ m(-2) UVA) we have used previously for mutagenesis experiments with the same type of cells. ELISAs for the detection of pyrimidine dimers confirmed that much fewer dimers were formed with these doses of UVA, as compared to UVB. We found that cell cycle arrests (intra-S, G1/S, G2/M), mediated at least in part by activation of p53 and p95, are much more prominent and long-lasting with UVB than with UVA. In contrast, no prominent differences were found between UVA and UVB for other anti-mutagenic cellular responses (DNA repair, apoptosis). Our data suggest that less effective anti-mutagenic cellular responses, in particular different and shorter-lived cell cycle arrests, render pyrimidine dimers induced by UVA more mutagenic than pyrimidine dimers induced by UVB.
UVA 诱变的机制仍然存在争议。早期的研究表明,UVA 比 UVB 和其他紫外线引起嘧啶二聚体的突变形成率更高,并且其他证据表明,非嘧啶二聚体类型的 DNA 损伤对 UVA 诱变的贡献大于对 UVB 诱变的贡献。然而,最近发表的关于人原代皮肤细胞和小鼠中 UVA 诱导突变的光谱的数据表明,嘧啶二聚体不仅是 UVB 诱导的最常见的 DNA 损伤诱导突变类型,也是 UVA 诱导的最常见的 DNA 损伤诱导突变类型。由于这反驳了非二聚体类型的 DNA 损伤在 UVA 诱变中的突出作用,我们假设 UVA 诱导的嘧啶二聚体的突变率高于 UVB 诱导的嘧啶二聚体,这是由于 UVA 和 UVB 暴露细胞处理 DNA 损伤的方式不同。因此,我们在这里比较了人原代成纤维细胞在 UVB 和 UVA 照射后的细胞周期调控、DNA 修复和细胞凋亡,使用了我们之前在相同类型的细胞中进行诱变实验时使用的相同生理和大致等诱变剂量(100-300 J m(-2) UVB,100-300 kJ m(-2) UVA)。用于检测嘧啶二聚体的 ELISA 证实,与 UVB 相比,这些剂量的 UVA 形成的二聚体要少得多。我们发现,细胞周期阻滞(S 期、G1/S 期、G2/M 期),至少部分由 p53 和 p95 的激活介导,在 UVB 照射下比 UVA 照射下更为显著和持久。相比之下,UVA 和 UVB 之间在其他抗突变的细胞反应(DNA 修复、细胞凋亡)方面没有发现明显差异。我们的数据表明,由于更有效的抗突变细胞反应,特别是不同和寿命更短的细胞周期阻滞,使得 UVA 诱导的嘧啶二聚体比 UVB 诱导的嘧啶二聚体更具突变性。