Schools of Biology and Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 25;108(43):17726-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108628108. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
During recent decades, many tropical reefs have transitioned from coral to macroalgal dominance. These community shifts increase the frequency of algal-coral interactions and may suppress coral recovery following both anthropogenic and natural disturbance. However, the extent to which macroalgae damage corals directly, the mechanisms involved, and the species specificity of algal-coral interactions remain uncertain. Here, we conducted field experiments demonstrating that numerous macroalgae directly damage corals by transfer of hydrophobic allelochemicals present on algal surfaces. These hydrophobic compounds caused bleaching, decreased photosynthesis, and occasionally death of corals in 79% of the 24 interactions assayed (three corals and eight algae). Coral damage generally was limited to sites of algal contact, but algae were unaffected by contact with corals. Artificial mimics for shading and abrasion produced no impact on corals, and effects of hydrophobic surface extracts from macroalgae paralleled effects of whole algae; both findings suggest that local effects are generated by allelochemical rather than physical mechanisms. Rankings of macroalgae from most to least allelopathic were similar across the three coral genera tested. However, corals varied markedly in susceptibility to allelopathic algae, with globally declining corals such as Acropora more strongly affected. Bioassay-guided fractionation of extracts from two allelopathic algae led to identification of two loliolide derivatives from the red alga Galaxaura filamentosa and two acetylated diterpenes from the green alga Chlorodesmis fastigiata as potent allelochemicals. Our results highlight a newly demonstrated but potentially widespread competitive mechanism to help explain the lack of coral recovery on many present-day reefs.
在最近几十年中,许多热带珊瑚礁已经从珊瑚为主的群落转变为以大型藻类为主的群落。这些群落的转变增加了藻类与珊瑚之间相互作用的频率,并可能抑制珊瑚在人为和自然干扰后的恢复。然而,大型藻类直接对珊瑚造成损害的程度、涉及的机制以及藻类与珊瑚之间相互作用的物种特异性仍然不确定。在这里,我们进行了野外实验,证明了许多大型藻类通过转移藻类表面存在的疏水性化感化合物直接对珊瑚造成损害。这些疏水性化合物导致珊瑚白化、光合作用减少,在 24 次测定的相互作用中有 79%(三种珊瑚和八种藻类)的珊瑚偶尔死亡。珊瑚的损害通常仅限于藻类接触的部位,但藻类与珊瑚接触后不受影响。藻类的遮蔽和磨损人工模拟物对珊瑚没有影响,而大型藻类的疏水性表面提取物的作用与藻类的作用相似;这两个发现都表明局部影响是由化感化合物而不是物理机制产生的。在所测试的三种珊瑚属中,从最具化感作用到最不具化感作用的大型藻类的排名是相似的。然而,珊瑚对化感藻类的敏感性差异很大,全球数量减少的珊瑚,如 Acropora,受影响更大。对两种化感藻类提取物的生物测定指导的分级分离导致从红藻 Galaxaura filamentosa 中鉴定出两种 lolilide 衍生物,从绿藻 Chlorodesmis fastigiata 中鉴定出两种乙酰化二萜作为有效的化感化合物。我们的研究结果突出了一种新发现的但可能广泛存在的竞争机制,有助于解释为什么在当今许多珊瑚礁上珊瑚无法恢复。