McLaughlin A F, Magee M A, Greenough R, Allman K C, Southee A E, Meikle S R, Hutton B F, Joshua D E, Bautovich G J, Morris J G
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;16(8-10):755-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00998184.
Gallium 67 scanning in the malignant lymphomas has been done, with variable success, for over 20 years. After initial enthusiasm, the technique fell into disrepute and it was not until the early 1980s that it enjoyed a revival. There have been many major contributions to the literature, both favourable and unfavourable. The reasons for the latter include: poor instrumentation (only single-pulse height analysis), low gallium 67 doses, impatient and careless scanning techniques, timing of the study after treatment (chemotherapy, radiation) and insensitive methods of confirmation of the presence or absence of disease ("truth"). Anatomical diagnostic techniques (computed tomography, plain X-radiography, magnetic resonance imaging and others) are incapable of distinguishing viable tumour in normal-size lymph nodes or necrotic/fibrotic residual masses. With improvements in instrumentation (triple-pulse height analysis, gamma camera resolution and tomographic techniques) gallium 67 can detect active tumour in residual masses and in normal-size nodes. This is due to gallium 67's unique ability to localize in viable tumour cells. It has greater than 90% sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value in patients with lymphoma. Its major contributions are in: staging (changing management of mediastinal disease, obviating the need for a laparotomy and clearly identifying stage IV disease); detecting relapse or residual, progressive disease (it establishes true complete remission and is often the first and only evidence of relapse before clinical evidence); predicting response to therapy (failure to convert to a negative scan post-treatment signals a poor prognosis and alternative therapy is required); and predicting outcome--prognosis (it is the only diagnostic modality to predict outcome accurately).
20多年来,镓67扫描一直被用于恶性淋巴瘤的诊断,其成功率各不相同。在最初的热情之后,这项技术声名狼藉,直到20世纪80年代初才重新兴起。文献中有许多重要的贡献,既有正面的,也有负面的。负面原因包括:仪器设备不佳(只有单脉冲高度分析)、镓67剂量低、扫描技术不耐烦和粗心、治疗(化疗、放疗)后研究的时间选择以及确认疾病存在与否(“真相”)的不敏感方法。解剖学诊断技术(计算机断层扫描、普通X线摄影、磁共振成像等)无法区分正常大小淋巴结中的存活肿瘤或坏死/纤维化残留肿块。随着仪器设备的改进(三脉冲高度分析、伽马相机分辨率和断层扫描技术),镓67可以检测残留肿块和正常大小淋巴结中的活性肿瘤。这是由于镓67独特的定位存活肿瘤细胞的能力。在淋巴瘤患者中,它具有超过90%的敏感性、特异性、准确性和阳性预测值。它的主要贡献在于:分期(改变纵隔疾病的治疗方式,避免剖腹手术的需要并明确识别IV期疾病);检测复发或残留、进展性疾病(它确定真正的完全缓解,并且通常是临床证据出现之前复发的首个也是唯一证据);预测治疗反应(治疗后未能转为阴性扫描表明预后不良,需要替代治疗);以及预测结果——预后(它是唯一能准确预测结果的诊断方式)。