Canini R, Battista G, Monetti N, Pisi P, Fanti S, Zinzani P L, Zompatori M, Bendandi M, Gherlinzoni F, Corinaldesi A
Istituto di Radiologia, Università, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna.
Radiol Med. 1995 Oct;90(4):448-56.
A residual mediastinal mass is a common finding during and/or after treatment for bulky mediastinal lymphoma and represents a difficult diagnostic problem. For correct therapy modulation, fibrosis must be distinguished from active disease. To assess diagnostic imaging potentials in the characterization of residual masses, 41 patients with bulky mediastinal lymphoma were examined with CT, MRI and Ga67-SPET; 92 examinations were performed for each technique: 14 before treatment, 42 during and after chemotherapy, 13 after radiotherapy and 23 six months after the end of treatment. CT provides useful pieces of information on tumor size but fails to depict tissue changes: therefore, only MR and SPET results were considered and compared with clinico-biological and follow-up findings. MRI and SPET were often in agreement with each other (78/92 cases) and with clinical data (98.7%); each examination yielded only one false positive. In case of disagreement (14/92 patients), MRI yielded more false-positive findings because it failed to differentiate neoplastic tissue from treatment-related conditions, i.e., granulation tissue, inflammation, necrosis, early fibrosis. In contrast, negative MR results were more reliable, MR negative predictive value being 100%. Ga67-SPET exhibited high sensitivity (97.1%) and specificity (91.2%), with fewer false positives than MRI (5 vs. 10). In conclusion, both examinations were accurate in the characterization of residual mediastinal masses during and after therapy, but MRI had higher sensitivity and Ga67-SPET higher specificity. Therefore, the authors acknowledge the complementary role of these two techniques and the necessity of an integrated approach, i.e., combined MRI and Ga67-SPET or CT and Ga67-SPET.
残留纵隔肿块是巨大纵隔淋巴瘤治疗期间和/或治疗后常见的表现,也是一个诊断难题。为了正确调整治疗方案,必须区分纤维化与活动性疾病。为评估残留肿块特征性诊断成像的潜力,对41例巨大纵隔淋巴瘤患者进行了CT、MRI和Ga67-SPET检查;每种技术均进行了92次检查:治疗前14次,化疗期间和化疗后42次,放疗后13次,治疗结束后6个月23次。CT可提供有关肿瘤大小的有用信息,但无法描绘组织变化:因此,仅考虑MR和SPET结果,并与临床生物学及随访结果进行比较。MRI和SPET结果常相互一致(78/92例),且与临床数据一致(98.7%);每次检查仅出现1例假阳性。在结果不一致的情况下(14/92例患者),MRI出现的假阳性结果更多,因为它无法将肿瘤组织与治疗相关情况(即肉芽组织、炎症、坏死、早期纤维化)区分开来。相比之下,MR阴性结果更可靠,MR阴性预测值为100%。Ga67-SPET表现出高敏感性(97.1%)和特异性(91.2%),假阳性比MRI少(分别为5例假阳性和10例假阳性)。总之,两种检查在治疗期间和治疗后残留纵隔肿块的特征性诊断方面都很准确,但MRI敏感性更高,Ga67-SPET特异性更高。因此,作者认可这两种技术的互补作用以及采用综合方法(即MRI与Ga67-SPET联合或CT与Ga67-SPET联合)的必要性。