Suppr超能文献

假针刺疗法对原发性失眠同样有效吗?一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析。

Is Sham Acupuncture Equally Effective for Primary Insomnia? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yuting, Wu Minmin, Zhang Jiongliang, Li Xinyue, Yu Donghui, Su Yumeng, Wei Xiangyu, Zhu Luwen

机构信息

Second Clinical Medical College, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.

Rehabilitation Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Nat Sci Sleep. 2025 Aug 29;17:1997-2012. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S541797. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy differences between acupuncture and sham acupuncture in adult primary insomnia through Bayesian network meta-analysis, analyze the impact of different types of sham acupuncture on efficacy, and explore the basis for the control setting.

METHODS

A literature search of seven databases, including PubMed and Embase, until April 23, 2025, included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AT with noninvasive sham acupuncture (NISA), superficial acupuncture (SA), and non-acupuncture therapy (NAT) for treating PI in adults. The statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.4.1) and Stata (version 15.1). The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD420251012912).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis incorporated 33 RCTs encompassing 3004 participants, with most studies originating from China. The results showed that at the treatment endpoint and after 4 weeks, AT significantly improved subjective sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) compared to SA and NISA, exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID: 2.5 points). Specifically, at the endpoint, AT vs SA (MD: -3.66; 95% CI: -4.48 to -2.84) and AT vs NISA (MD: -4.35; 95% CI: -5.67 to -3) were significant, while differences among SA, NISA, and NAT were not. Based on the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA), AT ranked first (99.9%), followed by SA (47.8%), NAT (31.9%), and NISA (20.4%). No significant differences were found between AT, NISA, and SA regarding objective sleep parameters.

CONCLUSION

AT significantly improved subjective sleep quality in patients with PI, though its impact on objective sleep measures was limited. When designing RCTs of acupuncture for PI, NISA is recommended as the sham acupuncture control. However, due to geographical limitations, the study results may be difficult to generalize. Future research should focus on monitoring objective sleep parameters and conducting international, multicenter RCTs involving diverse cultural populations.

摘要

目的

通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较针刺与假针刺治疗成人原发性失眠的疗效差异,分析不同类型假针刺对疗效的影响,并探索设置对照的依据。

方法

检索包括PubMed和Embase在内的七个数据库,检索截至2025年4月23日的文献,纳入比较针刺与非侵入性假针刺(NISA)、浅刺(SA)和非针刺疗法(NAT)治疗成人原发性失眠的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用R(版本4.4.1)和Stata(版本15.1)进行统计分析。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD420251012912)注册。

结果

该荟萃分析纳入了33项RCT,共3004名参与者,大多数研究来自中国。结果显示,在治疗终点和4周后,与SA和NISA相比,针刺显著改善了主观睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI),超过了最小临床重要差异(MCID:2.5分)。具体而言,在终点时,针刺与SA(MD:-3.66;95%CI:-4.48至-2.84)和针刺与NISA(MD:-4.35;95%CI:-5.67至-3)之间的差异具有统计学意义,而SA、NISA和NAT之间的差异无统计学意义。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA),针刺排名第一(99.9%),其次是SA(47.8%)、NAT(31.9%)和NISA(20.4%)。在客观睡眠参数方面,针刺、NISA和SA之间未发现显著差异。

结论

针刺显著改善了原发性失眠患者的主观睡眠质量,但其对客观睡眠指标的影响有限。在设计针刺治疗原发性失眠的RCT时,建议将NISA作为假针刺对照。然而,由于地域限制,研究结果可能难以推广。未来的研究应侧重于监测客观睡眠参数,并开展涉及不同文化人群的国际多中心RCT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7d9/12406035/92eabfdfa8e6/NSS-17-1997-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验