Buber Jonathan, Glikson Michael, Eldar Michael, Luria David
Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011 Oct;16(4):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00463.x.
Patients with atrial fibrillation sustain a significant lower exercise tolerance compared to those in sinus rhythm, even while seemingly in adequate rate-control.
Exercise testing was performed during atrial fibrillation and after electric cardioversion for 30 patients who were initially treated with AV modifying agents and were considered in adequate rate control. Heart rate parameters were obtained during all exercise stages, and a graphic display of heart rate acceleration was obtained. For those patients who remained in sinus rhythm, an additional exercise test was performed after 1 month.
During atrial fibrillation, heart rate at the completion of Bruce stage 1 and the peak exercise heart rate were significantly higher when compared to sinus rhythm (120 ± 10 bpm vs. 98 ± 11 bpm and 164 ± 16 bpm vs. 129 ± 11 bpm respectively, p < 0.001 for both). The time to peak exercise heart rate was significantly shorter during atrial fibrillation (3.5 ± 1 min vs. 6.5 ± 1.5 min, p < 0.001), and the total exercise duration was subsequently shorter as well (6 ± 2 min vs. 8.5 ± 2 min, p < 0.001). Treatment with beta-blockers prior to exercise did not affect the earlier peaking of the heart rate. After 1 month, similar time to peak heart rate and similar exercise performance were observed among patients, who remained in sinus rhythm, when compared to to the post-cardioversion exercise test.
In patients with atrial fibrillation, exercise heart rate acceleration displays a specific pattern of early peaking. Earlier heart rate peaking occurs regardless of ample rate control while at rest or mild physical activity and contributes to overall lower exercise performance.
与窦性心律患者相比,房颤患者的运动耐量显著降低,即使在看似心率控制良好的情况下也是如此。
对30例最初接受房室结改良药物治疗且被认为心率控制良好的患者,在房颤期间及电复律后进行运动试验。在所有运动阶段获取心率参数,并获得心率加速的图形显示。对于仍维持窦性心律的患者,在1个月后额外进行一次运动试验。
在房颤期间,与窦性心律相比,布鲁斯阶段1结束时的心率以及运动峰值心率显著更高(分别为120±10次/分对98±11次/分和164±16次/分对129±11次/分,两者p均<0.001)。房颤期间达到运动峰值心率的时间显著更短(3.5±1分钟对6.5±1.5分钟,p<0.001),随后总的运动持续时间也更短(6±2分钟对8.5±2分钟,p<0.001)。运动前使用β受体阻滞剂治疗并未影响心率更早达到峰值。1个月后,与复律后的运动试验相比,维持窦性心律的患者达到峰值心率的时间和运动表现相似。
在房颤患者中,运动时心率加速呈现出早期达到峰值的特定模式。无论在静息或轻度体力活动时心率控制是否充分,心率都会更早达到峰值,这导致整体运动表现降低。