Gosselink A T, Smit A J, Crijns H J, Hillege H H, Lie K I
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 1996 Jun;17(6):926-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014975.
In atrial fibrillation, exercise capacity is often reduced. This is usually ascribed to a decreased cardiac output as compared with sinus rhythm. Very few studies, however, have focused on changes in the peripheral blood flow during atrial fibrillation as a potential mechanism for exercise limitation. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm on peripheral blood flow. Calf blood flow, using an electrocardiogram-triggered venous occlusion plethysmograph, and peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), using treadmill exercise testing, were studied in 28 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation eligible for electrical cardioversion. Measurements were performed before cardioversion, and repeated 1 day and 1 month thereafter. Calf blood flow at rest, maximal calf blood flow, and minimal calf vascular resistance during the hyperaemic response immediately following 700 J of calf exercise were determined plethysmographically. One day and 1 month after cardioversion, 23 and 14 patients were still in sinus rhythm, respectively. In patients who still had sinus rhythm after 1 month, maximal calf blood flow increased from 33.7 +/- 12 to 40.0 +/- 13 ml. 100 ml-1.min-1 (P < 0.01) and minimal calf vascular resistance fell from 3.2 +/- 0.9 to 2.7 +/- 0.7 mmHg. ml-1. 100 ml-1. min-1 (P < 0.01); peak VO2 increased from 21.3 +/- 4 to 24.2 +/- 5 ml. min-1. kg-1 (P < 0.001). Calf blood flow at rest did not improve. In contrast, no significant changes in maximal calf blood flow, minimal calf vascular resistance and peak VO2 occurred in patients who had atrial fibrillation 1 month after cardioversion. A significant correlation was found between changes in maximal calf blood flow and peak VO2 1 month after cardioversion (r = 0.53, P < 0.01). One day after cardioversion, no changes in calf blood flow or peak VO2 were found, either in patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, transition from chronic atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm is associated with a (delayed) improvement in maximal calf blood flow, minimal calf vascular resistance, and peak VO2. Our findings suggest that increase in vasodilatory reserve capacity may contribute to the improvement of exercise capacity after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
在心房颤动中,运动能力常降低。这通常归因于与窦性心律相比心输出量减少。然而,很少有研究关注心房颤动期间外周血流的变化,将其作为运动受限的潜在机制。本研究的目的是确定心房颤动转复为窦性心律对外周血流的影响。使用心电图触发的静脉阻塞体积描记法测量28例适合电复律的慢性心房颤动患者的小腿血流量,并使用跑步机运动试验测量其峰值耗氧量(峰值VO₂)。在复律前进行测量,并在复律后1天和1个月重复测量。通过体积描记法确定静息时小腿血流量、最大小腿血流量以及在700J小腿运动后立即出现的充血反应期间的最小小腿血管阻力。复律后1天和1个月,分别有23例和14例患者仍维持窦性心律。在复律后1个月仍维持窦性心律的患者中,最大小腿血流量从33.7±12增加至40.0±13ml·100ml⁻¹·min⁻¹(P<0.01),最小小腿血管阻力从3.2±0.9降至2.7±0.7mmHg·ml⁻¹·100ml⁻¹·min⁻¹(P<0.01);峰值VO₂从21.3±4增加至24.2±5ml·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹(P<0.001)。静息时小腿血流量未改善。相比之下,复律后1个月仍有心房颤动的患者,其最大小腿血流量、最小小腿血管阻力和峰值VO₂无显著变化。复律后1个月,最大小腿血流量变化与峰值VO₂之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.53,P<0.01)。复律后1天,无论是窦性心律还是心房颤动患者,小腿血流量或峰值VO₂均无变化。总之,从慢性心房颤动转变为窦性心律与最大小腿血流量、最小小腿血管阻力和峰值VO₂的(延迟)改善相关。我们的研究结果表明,血管舒张储备能力的增加可能有助于心房颤动复律后运动能力的改善。