• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“参加临床试验:这适合你吗?”:一项对临床试验视频及其对知情同意过程影响的随机研究。

"Entering a Clinical Trial: Is it Right for You?": a randomized study of The Clinical Trials Video and its impact on the informed consent process.

机构信息

Bone Marrow Transplant and Hematologic Malignancies, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1877-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26438. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26438
PMID:22009665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3262890/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This randomized study was designed to assess the utility of an educational video in preparing cancer patients for decisions about clinical trial participation. The study assessed the effect of the video on patients' understanding and perceptions of clinical trials, its impact on decision making and patient-provider communication, and patients' satisfaction with the video.

METHODS

Ninety adults considering cancer clinical trials were randomized to receive (n = 45) or not receive (n = 45) the video. Using the validated Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC), respondents' knowledge about clinical trial participation was assessed. All subjects completed additional questions about satisfaction with the video, decision making, and patient-provider communication. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, regression model, and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Although intent-to-treat analysis found no significant group differences in objective understanding between those randomized to view or not view the video, the majority of participants reported favorable experiences with regard to watching the video: 85% found the video was an important source of information about clinical trials; 81% felt better prepared to discuss the trial with their physician; 89% of those who watched the video with family indicated that it helped family better understand clinical trials; and 73% indicated it helped family accept their decision about participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the video did not measurably improve patients' knowledge about clinical trials, it was an important source of information, helped educate families, and enhanced patient communication with their oncology providers.

摘要

目的

本随机研究旨在评估教育视频在帮助癌症患者准备参与临床试验决策方面的效用。该研究评估了视频对患者对临床试验的理解和认知的影响、对决策和医患沟通的影响,以及患者对视频的满意度。

方法

90 名考虑参加癌症临床试验的成年人被随机分为接受(n=45)或不接受(n=45)视频组。使用经过验证的知情同意质量评估工具(QuIC)评估受访者对临床试验参与的知识。所有受试者都完成了关于对视频的满意度、决策和医患沟通的附加问题。数据分析采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验、回归模型和描述性统计。

结果

尽管意向治疗分析发现,随机观看或不观看视频的组间在客观理解方面没有显著差异,但大多数参与者对观看视频的体验表示满意:85%的参与者认为视频是关于临床试验的重要信息来源;81%的参与者感到更有准备与医生讨论试验;89%的与家人一起观看视频的参与者表示,这有助于家人更好地理解临床试验;73%的参与者表示这有助于家人接受他们参与试验的决定。

结论

虽然视频没有显著提高患者对临床试验的知识,但它是一个重要的信息来源,有助于教育家属,并增强患者与肿瘤学提供者的沟通。

相似文献

1
"Entering a Clinical Trial: Is it Right for You?": a randomized study of The Clinical Trials Video and its impact on the informed consent process.“参加临床试验:这适合你吗?”:一项对临床试验视频及其对知情同意过程影响的随机研究。
Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1877-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26438. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
2
Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial.教育视频辅助与传统方式进行创伤相关清创手术知情同意的比较:一项平行组随机对照试验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7.
3
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub2.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
Development and pilot testing of an informed consent video for patients with limb trauma prior to debridement surgery using a modified Delphi technique.使用改良德尔菲技术为肢体创伤患者在清创手术前制作知情同意视频并进行试点测试。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 29;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0228-3.
6
Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem.患者对参与癌症临床试验的决策满意度较高,但理解存在问题。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Mar;19(3):371-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0829-6. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
7
Patient satisfaction with an informed consent process.患者对知情同意过程的满意度。
Cancer Pract. 1997 May-Jun;5(3):162-7.
8
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process.评估患者信息视频在知情同意过程中的益处。
Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Mar;30(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00968-8.
10
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验的知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study.比较对不同同意媒介的态度:半结构化定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e53113. doi: 10.2196/53113.
2
Interventions supporting cancer patients in making decisions regarding participation in clinical trials - a systematic review.支持癌症患者参与临床试验决策的干预措施 - 系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1097. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10066-9.
3
Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States.与临床试验邀请和参与相关的人口统计学和健康行为因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792.
4
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT).一项随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在比较增强型知情同意与标准知情同意,以提高患者对早期肿瘤临床试验的理解(CONSENT)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e049217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217.
5
Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial.在不确定性面前做出选择:运用理论指导的定性方法,确定参与早期嵌合抗原受体 T(CAR-T)细胞治疗试验的潜在患者障碍和促进因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e043929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929.
6
Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review.知情同意过程中的数字工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8.
7
Randomised placebo-controlled multicentre effectiveness trial of adjunct betamethasone therapy in hospitalised children with community-acquired pneumonia: a trial protocol for the KIDS-STEP trial.随机安慰剂对照多中心有效性试验:辅助倍他米松治疗住院社区获得性肺炎儿童:KIDS-STEP 试验的试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 29;10(12):e041937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041937.
8
Evaluating a Video-Based, Personalized Webpage in Genitourinary Oncology Clinical Trials: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial.评估基于视频的个性化网页在泌尿生殖系统肿瘤临床试验中的应用:一项2期随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 2;21(5):e12044. doi: 10.2196/12044.
9
Does the provision of a DVD-based audio-visual presentation improve recruitment in a clinical trial? A randomised trial of DVD trial invitations.提供基于 DVD 的视听演示是否能提高临床试验的招募效果?一项关于 DVD 试验邀请的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0663-6.
10
Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa.在南非艾滋病诊所,作为一种同意工具的教育视频对患者及护理人员关于治愈研究知识的影响。
J Virus Erad. 2018 Apr 1;4(2):103-107. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30252-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' unrealistic hopes for cancer trial benefits may hinder consent.患者对癌症试验益处不切实际的期望可能会妨碍同意参与。
JAMA. 2011 Mar 23;305(12):1186-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.317.
2
Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.癌症临床试验参与者的知识水平和认知理解——与知情同意程序相关的因素。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774510384516. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
3
An intervention to improve cancer patients' understanding of early-phase clinical trials.一项旨在提高癌症患者对早期临床试验理解的干预措施。
IRB. 2009 May-Jun;31(3):1-10.
4
Purpose and benefits of early phase cancer trials: what do oncologists say? What do patients hear?早期癌症试验的目的和益处:肿瘤学家怎么说?患者听到了什么?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Sep;3(3):57-68. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.3.57.
5
Improving informed consent to chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial of written information versus an interactive multimedia CD-ROM.改善化疗知情同意情况:书面信息与交互式多媒体光盘的随机对照试验
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.021. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
6
Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.标准化录音带与录制的会诊以增强乳腺癌临床试验的知情同意
Psychooncology. 2007 Apr;16(4):371-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.1070.
7
Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things?肿瘤学试验的知情同意书:有人读过这些东西吗?
Am J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec;27(6):570-5. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3.
8
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.提高研究参与者对研究知情同意理解的干预措施:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1593-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.
9
Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.治疗性误解与临床试验中对风险的认知
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1689-97. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00338-1.
10
Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials.儿童白血病试验中随机分组的传达
JAMA. 2004 Jan 28;291(4):470-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.4.470.