• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较对不同同意媒介的态度:半结构化定性研究。

Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study.

机构信息

SnT, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

LIDER Lab, DIRPOLIS, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e53113. doi: 10.2196/53113.

DOI:10.2196/53113
PMID:38687983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11094594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As consent for data sharing evolves with the digital age, plain-text consent is not the only format in which information can be presented. However, designing a good consent form is highly challenging. The addition of graphics, video, and other mediums to use can vary widely in effectiveness; and improper use can be detrimental to users.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the expectations and experiences of adults toward consent given in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic forms in a health data sharing scenario to better understand the appropriateness of different mediums and identify elements of each medium that most affect engagement with the content.

METHODS

We designed mock consent forms in infographic, video, text, newsletter, and comic versions. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults who were interviewed about their expectations for consent and were then shown each consent medium and asked about engaging elements across mediums, preferences for consent mediums, and the value of document quality criteria. We transcribed and qualitatively co-coded to identify themes and perform analyses.

RESULTS

We interviewed 24 users and identified different thematic archetypes based on participant goals, such as the Trust Seeker, who considered their own understanding and trust in organizations when making decisions. The infographic was ranked first for enhancing understanding, prioritizing information, and maintaining the proper audience fit for serious consent in health data sharing scenarios. In addition, specific elements such as structure, step-by-step organization, and readability were preferred engaging elements.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified archetypes to better understand user needs and elements that can be targeted to enhance user engagement with consent forms; this can help inform the design of more effective consent in the future. Overall, preferences for mediums are highly contextual, and more research should be done.

摘要

背景

随着数字时代的发展,同意书的形式也在不断演变,不仅仅只有纯文本的形式。然而,设计一份好的同意书极具挑战性。添加图形、视频和其他媒体可以在效果上有很大的不同;而不当使用可能会对用户造成伤害。

目的

本研究旨在探索成年人在健康数据共享场景下对信息图表、视频、文本、新闻通讯和漫画形式的同意书的期望和体验,以更好地了解不同媒介的适当性,并确定每个媒介中最能影响内容参与度的元素。

方法

我们设计了信息图表、视频、文本、新闻通讯和漫画形式的模拟同意书。对成年人进行半结构化访谈,了解他们对同意书的期望,然后向他们展示每个同意书媒介,并询问他们对各媒介的参与元素、对同意书媒介的偏好以及文件质量标准的价值的看法。我们对访谈进行转录和定性共同编码,以识别主题并进行分析。

结果

我们采访了 24 名用户,并根据参与者的目标确定了不同的主题原型,例如“信任寻求者”,他们在做出决策时会考虑自己对组织的理解和信任。在健康数据共享场景中,信息图表在增强理解、优先处理信息和保持适当的受众定位方面排名第一。此外,具体的元素,如结构、逐步组织和可读性,都是受欢迎的参与元素。

结论

我们确定了原型,以更好地了解用户需求和可以针对的元素,从而增强用户对同意书的参与度;这有助于为未来提供更有效的同意书设计提供信息。总体而言,对媒介的偏好高度取决于上下文,应该进行更多的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/5baab94f0ecc/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/cd6f92f2c9ec/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/edf925882c8c/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/b648f521e44f/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/17daec7cadd7/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/300304f568a9/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/c09782100a75/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/5baab94f0ecc/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/cd6f92f2c9ec/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/edf925882c8c/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/b648f521e44f/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/17daec7cadd7/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/300304f568a9/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/c09782100a75/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1822/11094594/5baab94f0ecc/humanfactors_v11i1e53113_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Attitudes Toward Different Consent Mediums: Semistructured Qualitative Study.比较对不同同意媒介的态度:半结构化定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e53113. doi: 10.2196/53113.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
'CTRL': an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research.'CTRL': 一个在线的、动态同意和参与者参与平台,致力于解决基因组研究中同意的复杂性。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):687-698. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Ethical Criteria for Health-Promoting Nudges: A Case-by-Case Analysis.促进健康的助推的伦理标准:案例分析。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 May;19(5):48-59. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1588411.
3
Myth or Magic? Towards a Revised Theory of Informed Consent in Medical Research.
神话还是魔法?迈向医学研究中知情同意的修正理论
J Med Philos. 2019 Jan 14;44(1):33-49. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy034.
4
Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.全外显子组和全基因组测序知情同意书的可读性。
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):143-151. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0324-6. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
A cognitive approach for design of a multimedia informed consent video and website in pediatric research.一种用于儿科研究中多媒体知情同意视频和网站设计的认知方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:248-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.一项关于医学实践研究的多媒体信息辅助工具的随机研究:对知情同意的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1177/1740774516669352. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.学习风格:概念与证据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
8
The production of information in the attention economy.注意力经济中的信息生产。
Sci Rep. 2015 May 19;5:9452. doi: 10.1038/srep09452.
9
Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.志愿者参与的研究的参与者理解:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Nov;46(6):423-31. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12097. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.