• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Randomized study of cefatrizine versus cefaclor in conjunctivitis otitis syndrome].

作者信息

Cohen R, de la Rocque F, Bouhanna A, Boucherat M, Elbez A, Lecompte M D, Wollner A

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier de Créteil.

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):517-20.

PMID:2200994
Abstract

The association conjunctivitis-otitis is highly suggestive of Haemophilus influenzae infection. This conjunctivitis otitis syndrome could be a good model to assess the efficacy of different antibiotic regimen in the treatment of acute otitis media due to HI without tympanocentesis. This prospective randomized trial compared the efficacy of two orally cephalosporins which demonstrate in vitro an activity against HI. This study was conducted from 4.20.1988 to 3.15.1989 and involved 73 children with COS examined in an outpatient clinic. The mean age was 17.7 months. Before treatment culture were taken from the lower palpebral conjunctivae. 81 strains was found: HI 61 (beta-lactamase-producing 15), Streptococcus pneumoniae 16, Branhamella Catarrhalis 4. The 73 patients were treated with 40 to 50 mg/kg/day of the test drug for ten days, 25 with Cefaclor in 3 divided dose (group 1), 24 with Cefatrizine in 3 divided dose (group 2), 24 with Cefatrizine in 2 divided dose (group 3). The recoveries was obtained in 17/25 in the group 1, 18/24 in the group 2, 15/24 in the group 3. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Randomized study of cefatrizine versus cefaclor in conjunctivitis otitis syndrome].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):517-20.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
3
Comparative treatment trial of augmentin versus cefaclor for acute otitis media with effusion.阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与头孢克洛治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的对比治疗试验。
Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):819-26.
4
Evaluation of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗急性中耳炎的疗效评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:39-41.
5
[An open randomized trial, Pediazole versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children].[一项开放性随机试验:小儿用抗菌剂(Pediazole)与头孢克洛治疗儿童急性中耳炎的对比研究]
Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1991 Feb;38(2):115-9.
6
[Cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for recurrent otitis media].[头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑用于复发性中耳炎]
Harefuah. 1989 Dec 1;117(11):361-3.
7
Cefaclor compared with amoxycillin acute otitis media with effusion: a preliminary report.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗渗出性急性中耳炎的比较:初步报告。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:42-9.
8
Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of high dose amoxicillin for therapy of acute otitis media in children.大剂量阿莫西林治疗儿童急性中耳炎的细菌学及临床疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 May;22(5):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000065688.21336.fa.
9
Randomized controlled study of clarithromycin versus cefaclor suspensions in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.
J Chemother. 1995 Nov;7 Suppl 4:150-3.
10
[Treatment of acute otitis media: comparative study of efficacy of cefatrizine and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1991 May;39(5):555-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum.预防新生儿眼炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 21;9(9):CD001862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001862.pub4.