• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑用于复发性中耳炎]

[Cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for recurrent otitis media].

作者信息

Fliss D M, Krauss M, Gorodischer R, Bearman J, Lieberman A

出版信息

Harefuah. 1989 Dec 1;117(11):361-3.

PMID:2695415
Abstract

The efficacy of cefaclor and of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in the management of recurrent otitis media was evaluated in a randomized single-blind controlled trial. The median age of the patients was 12 months (range 5-37); there were 37 boys and 19 girls. All had received 1 or more courses of antibacterials for acute otitis media in the previous 2-3 weeks. 27 were treated with oral cefaclor suspension, 40 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses, and 29 with 1 mg/kg/day of TMP-SMX (trimethoprim 8 mg, sulfamethoxazole 40 mg) in 2 divided doses, each group for 10 days. 70% of the cefaclor group and 90% of the TMP-SMX group were cured after the 10 days of therapy (0.1 greater than p greater than 0.05). Results were not better on the 21st day as compared with the 10th. Our data indicate a mild preference for TMP-SMX (although p was not less than 0.05), since it needs to be given only twice a day and costs less than cefaclor.

摘要

在一项随机单盲对照试验中,评估了头孢克洛和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)治疗复发性中耳炎的疗效。患者的中位年龄为12个月(范围5 - 37个月);有37名男孩和19名女孩。所有患者在过去2 - 3周内均接受过1个或更多疗程的急性中耳炎抗菌治疗。27例患者接受口服头孢克洛混悬液治疗,40mg/kg/天,分3次给药;29例患者接受1mg/kg/天的TMP-SMX(甲氧苄啶8mg,磺胺甲恶唑40mg)治疗,分2次给药,每组治疗10天。治疗10天后,头孢克洛组70%的患者和TMP-SMX组90%的患者治愈(0.1>p>0.05)。与第10天相比,第21天的结果并无改善。我们的数据表明对TMP-SMX有轻微偏好(尽管p不小于0.05),因为它每天只需给药2次,且成本低于头孢克洛。

相似文献

1
[Cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for recurrent otitis media].[头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑用于复发性中耳炎]
Harefuah. 1989 Dec 1;117(11):361-3.
2
A randomized controlled trial of cefaclor compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性中耳炎的随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1984 Oct;105(4):633-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80438-2.
3
Comparison of cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性中耳炎的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1984 Jan-Feb;3(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198401000-00007.
4
Comparative treatment trial of augmentin versus cefaclor for acute otitis media with effusion.阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与头孢克洛治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的对比治疗试验。
Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):819-26.
5
Three-day and seven-day treatment in acute otitis media: a double-blind antibiotic trial.急性中耳炎的三日和七日治疗:一项双盲抗生素试验。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Aug;36(289):356-8.
6
[Randomized study of cefatrizine versus cefaclor in conjunctivitis otitis syndrome].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1990 Jun;38(5 ( Pt 2)):517-20.
7
Outcome-oriented managed care comparing efficacies of cefaclor and amoxicillin in acute and recurrent acute otitis media.以结果为导向的管理式医疗:比较头孢克洛和阿莫西林在急性及复发性急性中耳炎中的疗效
Ear Nose Throat J. 1995 Dec;74(12):840-4.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
9
Evaluation of cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗急性中耳炎的疗效评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:39-41.
10
A trial comparing cefaclor with co-trimoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.一项比较头孢克洛与复方新诺明治疗急性中耳炎疗效的试验。
Arch Dis Child. 1982 Aug;57(8):594-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.8.594.