• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行早期血管造影指导下完全血运重建与罪犯血管 PCI 后缺血指导的分期 PCI 比较。

Early angio-guided complete revascularization versus culprit vessel PCI followed by ischemia-guided staged PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00666.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00666.x
PMID:22010970
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of multivessel disease (MVD) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare short- and long-term clinical outcomes of early-staged, angio-guided approach and delayed, ischemia-guided treatment of non-infarct-related arteries (IRAs).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with STEMI and MVD treated with primary PCI in 6 tertiary care centers were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite end-point of death, MI, and repeat revascularization. All the events were adjudicated according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definitions.

RESULTS

In the time period 2004-2008, 800 primary PCIs in STEMI patients with MVD were performed. Four hundred and seventeen were addressed to early-staged, angio-guided PCI of non-IRAs (CR group) and 383 to an incomplete revascularization (IncR group). During the hospital stay, no difference in terms of death and repeat revascularization was found between groups but the incidence of periprocedural MI/reinfarction and MACE was significantly higher in the CR group (13.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.01 and 14.1% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.017, respectively). At a mean follow-up of 642 ± 545 days, no difference in terms of death and MI was found between the CR and IncR group. The MACE-free survival was significantly higher in the IncR group (73.8% vs. 57%, log rank 0.05), mainly driven by the lower incidence of re-PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Early complete revascularization based only on angiographic findings in patients with STEMI and MVD is associated with an excess of periprocedural/re-MI and with a significantly higher incidence of MACE at follow-up.

摘要

背景

在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,多支血管病变(MVD)的最佳治疗方法仍不明确。

目的

比较早期血管造影指导下治疗非梗死相关动脉(IRA)与延迟缺血指导下治疗非梗死相关动脉的短期和长期临床结果。

方法

回顾性分析了在 6 家三级护理中心接受直接 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 合并 MVD 的连续患者。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为死亡、心肌梗死和再次血运重建的复合终点。所有事件均根据学术研究联合会(ARC)的定义进行裁决。

结果

在 2004 年至 2008 年期间,对 800 例 STEMI 合并 MVD 患者进行了 800 例直接 PCI。其中 417 例接受早期血管造影指导下的非 IRA 直接 PCI(CR 组),383 例接受不完全血运重建(IncR 组)。住院期间,两组间在死亡和再次血运重建方面无差异,但 CR 组围手术期心肌梗死/再梗死和 MACE 的发生率显著较高(13.9%比 3.1%,P=0.01 和 14.1%比 9.1%,P=0.017)。平均随访 642±545 天后,CR 组和 IncR 组在死亡和心肌梗死方面无差异。IncR 组的 MACE 无事件生存率显著较高(73.8%比 57%,对数秩检验 P=0.05),主要原因是再次 PCI 的发生率较低。

结论

在 STEMI 和 MVD 患者中,仅根据血管造影结果进行早期完全血运重建与围手术期/再发心肌梗死的发生率增加有关,并与随访时更高的 MACE 发生率相关。

相似文献

1
Early angio-guided complete revascularization versus culprit vessel PCI followed by ischemia-guided staged PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行早期血管造影指导下完全血运重建与罪犯血管 PCI 后缺血指导的分期 PCI 比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00666.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
2
Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后经直接血管成形术治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病的管理
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Feb;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00317.x. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
3
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
4
Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间罪犯血管单独处理与完全冠状动脉血运重建的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
5
Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.小血管病变患者经分数血流储备指导的经皮冠状动脉血运重建术的长期临床结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;5(1):62-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966937. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
6
Coronary revascularization strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: experience and results at 1-year follow-up.多支血管病变合并 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的血运重建策略:1 年随访的经验和结果。
Am J Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):92-100. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181b809ee.
7
Angiography-guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Ischemia-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Significant Disease in Non-Infarct-related Arteries in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease.在多支冠状动脉疾病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,非梗死相关动脉严重病变管理中血管造影引导下多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与缺血引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及药物治疗的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Jun;17(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000144.
8
Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: a randomized comparison.多支血管病变中完全血运重建与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的随机对照研究
Am Heart J. 2004 Sep;148(3):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.026.
9
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一项前瞻性多中心随机试验,比较急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时由医生转运与由患者转运的情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91.
10
Culprit-only or multivessel percutaneous coronary stenting in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行罪犯血管或多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一年随访。
J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00477.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of residual myocardial ischemia on recovery of left ventricular function after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余心肌缺血对左心室功能恢复的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03777-3.
2
Is coronary multivessel disease in acute myocardial infarction patients still associated with worse clinical outcomes at 1-year?急性心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉多支血管病变在 1 年内是否仍与更差的临床结局相关?
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):429-437. doi: 10.1002/clc.23567. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
3
Immediate versus deferred percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
即刻与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0234655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234655. eCollection 2020.
4
Multivessel versus culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行多支血管与罪犯血管血运重建的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Nov;109(11):1381-1391. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01637-6. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建:当代综述
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 7;20(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0636-9.
6
Deferred Versus Immediate Stenting in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者延迟支架置入与直接支架置入的系统评价和Meta分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 8;6(3):e004838. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004838.
7
Comparison of clinical outcomes between culprit vessel only and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel coronary diseases.仅对罪犯血管进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与对多支血管进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在多支冠状动脉疾病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的临床结局比较。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 May;12(3):208-17. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.03.014.
8
Management of multivessel coronary disease after primary angioplasty: staged reintervention versus optimized clinical treatment and two-year follow-up.初次血管成形术后多支冠状动脉疾病的管理:分期再次干预与优化临床治疗及两年随访
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Apr-Jun;29(2):177-85. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140051.
9
Impact of completeness of revascularization by coronary intervention on exercise capacity early after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后早期,冠状动脉介入治疗的血管再通完整性对运动能力的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 19;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-50.
10
Coronary vessel diameters during and after primary percutaneous coronary artery intervention.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间及之后的冠状动脉直径
Herz. 2014 Jun;39(4):515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00059-013-3865-4. Epub 2013 Jul 7.