• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of completeness of revascularization by coronary intervention on exercise capacity early after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后早期,冠状动脉介入治疗的血管再通完整性对运动能力的影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 19;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-50.
2
Culprit-only versus multivessel or complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention using newer-generation drug-eluting stents.在接受新一代药物洗脱支架成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多支血管病变患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与多血管或完全与不完全血运重建的比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2020 May;301:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
3
[Influencing factors of exercise tolerance in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization in acute phase].[急性心肌梗死患者急性期行经皮冠状动脉介入血管重建术后运动耐量的影响因素]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 1;58(10):763-769. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.10.008.
4
Angiography-guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Ischemia-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Significant Disease in Non-Infarct-related Arteries in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease.在多支冠状动脉疾病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,非梗死相关动脉严重病变管理中血管造影引导下多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与缺血引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及药物治疗的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Jun;17(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000144.
5
Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单支或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):927-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21722.
6
Association of Coronary Vessel Characteristics With Outcome in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Incomplete Revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗未完全血运重建患者的冠状动脉特征与结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):123-130. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4787.
7
Multivessel disease in patients over 75years old with ST elevated myocardial infarction. Current management strategies and related clinical outcomes in the ESTROFA MI+75 nation-wide registry.75岁以上ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的多支血管病变。ESTROFA MI+75全国注册研究中的当前管理策略及相关临床结局
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(5 Pt B):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
8
Immediate complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ORBI registry.直接血运重建治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴多支血管病变患者的疗效:来自 ORBI 注册研究的结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Nov;111(11):656-665. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
10
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴心原性休克患者行多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与梗死相关动脉血运重建的长期临床结局比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e013870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013870. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Exercise Capacity Following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后运动能力的决定因素
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Oct 28;8(11):140. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8110140.
2
Cardiac Rehabilitation of Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Han Population in Northern China: A Prospective Cohort Study.中国北方汉族人群中接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心脏康复:一项前瞻性队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Aug 28;14:4959-4965. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S326725. eCollection 2021.
3
Efficacy of CPET Combined with Systematic Education of Cardiac Rehabilitation After PCI: A Real-World Evaluation in ACS Patients.CPET 联合 PCI 后心脏康复系统教育对 ACS 患者的疗效:真实世界评价。
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4836-4846. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01871-y. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
4
A practical clinical approach to utilize cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation and management of coronary artery disease: a primer for cardiologists.在冠状动脉疾病评估和管理中运用心肺运动试验的实用临床方法:心脏病专家入门指南
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;33(2):168-177. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000494.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction.随机对照试验预防心肌梗死的血管成形术。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1115-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305520. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
2
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理的欧洲心脏病学会指南
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
Culprit-Lesion-Only Versus Multivessel Revascularization Using Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-Based Analysis.罪犯血管病变血运重建与药物洗脱支架多血管重建治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的对比:基于韩国急性心肌梗死注册登记的分析。
Korean Circ J. 2011 Dec;41(12):718-25. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.718. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
4
Early angio-guided complete revascularization versus culprit vessel PCI followed by ischemia-guided staged PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行早期血管造影指导下完全血运重建与罪犯血管 PCI 后缺血指导的分期 PCI 比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00666.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
5
Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial.分期与“一次性”多血管经皮介入治疗急性心肌梗死的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中血管重建和支架与结局的协调)试验的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.071.
6
Primary PCI in STEMI--dilemmas and controversies: multivessel disease in STEMI patients. Complete versus Culprit Vessel revascularization in acute ST--elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——困境与争议:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的多支血管病变。急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死完全血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2011 Jun;59(3):225-33.
7
Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后多支冠状动脉病变的处理。
Am Heart J. 2010 Dec;160(6 Suppl):S28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.013.
8
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
9
Examining treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of early intervention.探讨 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗:早期干预的重要性。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;15(1):6-16. doi: 10.1177/1074248409354600. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
10
Acute coronary syndromes: Diagnosis and management, part II.急性冠状动脉综合征:诊断与管理,第二部分
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Nov;84(11):1021-36. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60674-5.

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后早期,冠状动脉介入治疗的血管再通完整性对运动能力的影响。

Impact of completeness of revascularization by coronary intervention on exercise capacity early after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Zhao Wei, Bai Jin, Zhang Fuchun, Guo Lijun, Gao Wei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital; Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory peptides, Ministry of Health; Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 19;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-50.

DOI:10.1186/1749-8090-9-50
PMID:24641986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3995092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of achieving complete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) on exercise capacity remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare exercise capacity early after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in patients receiving PCI with stenting, between those completely revascularized (CR) and those incompletely revascularized (IR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 326 patients [single-vessel disease (SVD) group, 118 patients; multivessel disease (MVD) with CR group, 112 patients; MVD with IR group, 96 patients] who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing 7-30 days after STEMI to measure peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO2AT), and peak oxygen pulse. Demographic data, presence of concomitant diseases, STEMI characteristics, and echocardiography and angiography findings were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (89.0%) and mean age was 55.6 ± 11.2 years. Ischemic ST deviation occurred in 7.1%, with no significant difference between groups. VO2peak and VO2AT did not differ significantly between groups, despite a trend to be lower in the CR and IR groups compared with the SVD group. Peak oxygen pulse was significantly higher in the SVD group than in the IR group (p = 0.005). After adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors, MI characteristics and echocardiography parameters, CR was not an independent predictor of VO2peak (OR = -0.123, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.986 to 0.232, p = 0.093), VO2AT (OR = 0.002, 95% CI 1.735 to 1.773, p = 0.983), or peak oxygen pulse (OR = -0.102, 95% CI -1.435 to 0.105, p = 0.090).

CONCLUSION

CR in patients with STEMI treated with PCI for multivessel disease might show no benefit on short-term exercise tolerance over IR.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)实现急性心肌梗死(MI)患者完全血运重建对运动能力的重要性仍不明确。

目的

比较接受支架置入PCI治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,完全血运重建(CR)者与不完全血运重建(IR)者早期的运动能力。

方法

我们回顾性分析了326例患者[单支血管病变(SVD)组118例;多支血管病变(MVD)伴CR组112例;MVD伴IR组96例],这些患者在STEMI后7 - 30天接受了心肺运动试验,以测量峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)、无氧阈摄氧量(VO2AT)和峰值氧脉搏。评估了人口统计学数据、合并疾病情况、STEMI特征以及超声心动图和血管造影结果。

结果

大多数患者为男性(89.0%),平均年龄为55.6±11.2岁。7.1%的患者出现缺血性ST段压低,组间无显著差异。尽管CR组和IR组与SVD组相比有降低趋势,但组间VO2peak和VO2AT无显著差异。SVD组的峰值氧脉搏显著高于IR组(p = 0.005)。在调整年龄、性别、体重指数、心血管危险因素、MI特征和超声心动图参数后,CR不是VO2peak(OR = -0.123,95%置信区间[CI] -2.986至0.232,p = 0.093)、VO2AT(OR = 0.002,95% CI 1.735至1.773,p = 0.983)或峰值氧脉搏(OR = -0.102,95% CI -1.435至0.105,p = 0.090)的独立预测因素。

结论

在接受PCI治疗的多支血管病变STEMI患者中,CR在短期运动耐量方面可能并不比IR更具优势。