• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑障碍患者对威胁场景的反应不同于健康对照组。

The response of social anxiety disorder patients to threat scenarios differs from that of healthy controls.

机构信息

Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Dec;44(12):1261-8. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500137. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500137
PMID:22011960
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the response of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients to threat scenarios. First-choice responses to 12 scenarios describing conspecific threatening situations and mean scores of defensive direction and defensive intensity dimensions were compared between 87 SAD patients free of medication and 87 matched healthy controls (HC). A significant gender difference in the first-choice responses was identified for seven scenarios among HCs but only for two scenarios among SAD patients. A significantly higher proportion of SAD patients chose "freezing" in response to "Bush" and "Noise" scenarios, whereas the most frequent response by HCs to these scenarios was "check out". SAD males chose "run away" and "yell" more often than healthy men in response to the scenarios "Park" and "Elevator", respectively. There was a positive correlation between the severity of symptoms and both defensive direction and defensive intensity dimensions. Factorial analysis confirmed the gradient of defensive reactions derived from animal studies. SAD patients chose more urgent defensive responses to threat scenarios, seeming to perceive them as more dangerous than HCs and tending to move away from the source of threat. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the physiopathology of anxiety disorders involves brain structures responsible for defensive behaviors.

摘要

本研究旨在评估社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者对威胁情境的反应。比较了 87 名未用药 SAD 患者和 87 名匹配的健康对照者(HC)对 12 个描述同种威胁情境的场景的首选反应,以及防御方向和防御强度维度的平均得分。在 HC 中,有 7 个场景存在显著的性别差异,但在 SAD 患者中只有 2 个场景存在显著的性别差异。与 HC 相比,SAD 患者在“Bush”和“噪声”场景中更倾向于选择“冻结”,而 HC 对这些场景的最常见反应是“查看”。SAD 男性在“公园”和“电梯”场景中比健康男性更倾向于选择“逃跑”和“喊叫”。症状严重程度与防御方向和防御强度维度均呈正相关。因子分析证实了源自动物研究的防御反应梯度。SAD 患者对威胁情境选择更紧急的防御反应,似乎比 HC 更危险,并倾向于远离威胁源。这与焦虑障碍的病理生理学涉及负责防御行为的大脑结构的假设一致。

相似文献

1
The response of social anxiety disorder patients to threat scenarios differs from that of healthy controls.社交焦虑障碍患者对威胁场景的反应不同于健康对照组。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Dec;44(12):1261-8. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500137. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
2
Human defensive behaviors to threat scenarios show parallels to fear- and anxiety-related defense patterns of non-human mammals.人类对威胁情景的防御行为与非人类哺乳动物的恐惧和焦虑相关防御模式相似。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Dec;25(7-8):761-70. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00056-2.
3
Defensive responses to threat scenarios in Brazilians reproduce the pattern of Hawaiian Americans and non-human mammals.巴西人对威胁情景的防御反应重现了夏威夷裔美国人和非人类哺乳动物的模式。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008 Apr;41(4):324-32. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008000400011.
4
Exploring the Structure of Human Defensive Responses from Judgments of Threat Scenarios.从威胁情景判断中探索人类防御反应的结构。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0133682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133682. eCollection 2015.
5
Reactions to threat and personality: psychometric differentiation of intensity and direction dimensions of human defensive behaviour.对威胁的反应与人格:人类防御行为强度和方向维度的心理测量学差异
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 25;169(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
6
Dynamics of Defensive Response Mobilization to Approaching External Versus Interoceptive Threat.对外界和内感受性威胁的防御反应动员的动力学。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):525-538. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
Translating dynamic defense patterns from rodents to people.将啮齿动物的动态防御模式转化应用于人类。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 May;76(Pt A):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.001.
8
Biased attention to threat in paediatric anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder) as a function of 'distress' versus 'fear' diagnostic categorization.儿童焦虑症(广泛性焦虑症、社交恐惧症、特定恐惧症、分离焦虑症)中,作为“痛苦”与“恐惧”诊断分类函数的对威胁的偏向性关注。
Psychol Med. 2014 Feb;44(3):607-16. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000779. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
9
Attention bias in adults with anorexia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and social anxiety disorder.神经性厌食症、强迫症和社交焦虑症成年患者的注意偏向。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Aug;79:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Stimulus-Driven Attention, Threat Bias, and Sad Bias in Youth with a History of an Anxiety Disorder or Depression.有焦虑症或抑郁症病史的青少年的刺激驱动性注意、威胁偏向和悲伤偏向
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;44(2):219-31. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-9988-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Fear and Anxiety Truly Distinct?恐惧与焦虑真的有区别吗?
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;2(4):341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.09.006. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Nuance and behavioral cogency: How the Visible Burrow System inspired the Stress-Alternatives Model and conceptualization of the continuum of anxiety.细微差别与行为说服力:可见洞穴系统如何激发了应激替代模型以及焦虑连续体的概念化。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Jul 1;146:86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.03.036.