• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于椎弓根螺钉的运动保留植入物的腰椎最佳刚度。

Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.

机构信息

Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):666-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2047-4. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-2047-4
PMID:22012215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3326134/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pedicle-screw-based dynamic implants are intended to preserve intervertebral mobility while releasing certain spinal structures. The aim of the study was to determine the as yet unknown optimal stiffness value of the longitudinal rods that fulfils best these opposing tasks.

METHODS

A finite element model of the lumbar spine was used which includes the posterior implant at level L4/5. More than 250 variations of this model were generated by varying the diameter of the longitudinal rods between 6 and 12 mm and their elastic modulus between 10 MPa and 200 MPa. The loading cases flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated. Evaluated optimization criteria were the ranges of motion, forces in the facet joints, posterior bulgings of the intervertebral disc and the intradiscal pressures. Various objective functions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results show that the objective values depend more on the axial stiffness of the rods than on bending and torsional stiffness, rod diameter and elastic modulus. The optimal stiffness value for most of the investigated objective functions is approximately 50 N/mm and is achieved, e.g. using a rod diameter of 6 mm and an elastic modulus of 50 MPa. The design with the least axial stiffness was the best one with regard to the mobility. The forces in the facet joints and the intradiscal pressures were reduced mostly by an implant with the highest axial stiffness. When minimal posterior disc bulging was the criterion, the optimal axial stiffness was also approximately 50 N/mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal axial stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine is approximately 50 N/mm.

摘要

目的

基于椎弓根螺钉的动态植入物旨在保持椎间活动度,同时释放某些脊柱结构。本研究的目的是确定满足这些相反任务的纵向杆的未知最佳刚度值。

方法

使用包括 L4/5 水平后路植入物的腰椎有限元模型。通过改变纵向杆的直径在 6 到 12 毫米之间,弹性模量在 10 到 200 兆帕之间,生成了超过 250 种该模型的变体。模拟了屈曲、伸展、侧屈和轴向旋转等加载情况。评估的优化标准是运动范围、关节突关节力、椎间盘后膨出和椎间盘内压力。评估了各种目标函数。

结果

结果表明,目标值更多地取决于杆的轴向刚度,而不是弯曲和扭转刚度、杆直径和弹性模量。对于大多数研究的目标函数,最佳刚度值约为 50 N/mm,例如使用直径为 6 毫米、弹性模量为 50 MPa 的杆即可实现。在大多数情况下,与活动度有关的最佳设计是轴向刚度最小的设计。关节突关节力和椎间盘内压力主要通过轴向刚度最高的植入物降低。当最小的椎间盘后膨出是标准时,最佳轴向刚度也约为 50 N/mm。

结论

基于椎弓根螺钉的腰椎运动保留植入物的最佳轴向刚度约为 50 N/mm。

相似文献

1
Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.基于椎弓根螺钉的运动保留植入物的腰椎最佳刚度。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):666-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2047-4. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
2
Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.基于椎弓根螺钉的运动保护系统对腰椎生物力学的影响:概率有限元研究及后续敏感性分析。
J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):2963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
3
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:各种内固定技术对腰椎灵活性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.经椎板小关节固定术的生物力学评估。聚-L-丙交酯销钉、螺钉及椎弓根固定的比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jun 15;23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199806150-00003.
5
Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.双侧后路动态和刚性固定装置对腰椎负荷影响的比较:有限元分析
Eur Spine J. 2007 Aug;16(8):1223-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0292-8. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
6
Effect of two-level pedicle-screw fixation with different rod materials on lumbar spine: A finite element study.不同棒材的两级椎弓根螺钉固定对腰椎的影响:一项有限元研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Mar;23(2):258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
7
Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.人工椎间盘对腰椎生物力学的影响:一项概率有限元研究。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan;18(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0836-1. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
8
Biomechanical testing of the lumbar facet interference screw.腰椎小关节干扰螺钉的生物力学测试
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):E34-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150484.85822.d0.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.一种新型基于椎弓根螺钉的后路动态稳定装置(Awesome Rod系统)的生物力学评估——有限元分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 9;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0538-x.
10
Ti2448 pedicle screw system augmentation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.后路腰椎间融合术中 Ti2448 椎弓根螺钉系统增强。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2008-15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a76fec.

引用本文的文献

1
A Muscle-Driven Spine Model for Predictive Simulations in the Design of Spinal Implants and Lumbar Orthoses.一种用于脊柱植入物和腰椎矫形器设计中预测模拟的肌肉驱动脊柱模型。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;12(3):263. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12030263.
2
Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.椎间融合器弹性模量与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合生物力学特性的定量关系:有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 7;12:1510597. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1510597. eCollection 2024.
3
Biomechanical Comparison between Isobar and Dynamic-Transitional Optima (DTO) Hybrid Lumbar Fixators: A Lumbosacral Finite Element and Intersegmental Motion Analysis.等压与动态过渡优化(DTO)混合腰椎固定器的生物力学比较:腰骶有限元和节段间运动分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 8;2022:8273853. doi: 10.1155/2022/8273853. eCollection 2022.
4
Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?脊柱后路稳定装置的临床前评估:我们能否比较器械上的体外和体内负荷?
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):200-209. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4766-z. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
5
Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?脊柱后路稳定装置的临床前评估:当前标准能否代表日常基本活动?
Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2909-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4622-1. Epub 2016 May 28.
6
Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.混合固定能否预防退行性腰椎疾病后路融合术后的交界性疾病?一项至少5年的随访研究。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 7:855-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4269-3. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
7
Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total spinal segment replacement (TSSR) utilizing a pendulum testing system.利用摆锤测试系统对植入全脊柱节段置换(TSSR)的腰椎进行动态生物力学检查。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057412. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
8
Dynamic biomechanical examination of the lumbar spine with implanted total disc replacement using a pendulum testing system.应用摆锤测试系统对植入式全椎间盘置换后的腰椎进行动态生物力学检查。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 1;37(23):E1438-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826b39d7.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimised in vitro applicable loads for the simulation of lateral bending in the lumbar spine.优化体外适用载荷以模拟腰椎侧向弯曲。
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Jul;34(6):777-80. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 3.
2
Optimised loads for the simulation of axial rotation in the lumbar spine.优化腰椎轴向旋转模拟的载荷。
J Biomech. 2011 Aug 11;44(12):2323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.040. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
3
Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database.腰椎间盘退变早期真的会导致不稳定吗?体外数据库评估。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):578-84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1635-z. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
4
Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.基于椎弓根螺钉的运动保护系统对腰椎生物力学的影响:概率有限元研究及后续敏感性分析。
J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):2963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
5
Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing.施加跟随负载可为模拟站立提供逼真的结果。
J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1520-1526. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.048. Epub 2009 May 10.
6
Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending.上半身弯曲的实际负荷条件。
J Biomech. 2009 May 11;42(7):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
7
Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system.一种新型后路动态稳定系统的前瞻性设计描述及随后的体外评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):255-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181920e9c.
8
Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.不同人工椎间盘运动学对脊柱生物力学的影响。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Feb;24(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 3.
9
Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system?设计一个柔性腰椎稳定系统需要后植入物具备哪些轴向和弯曲刚度?
J Biomech. 2009 Jan 5;42(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
10
Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices.基于椎弓根的动态和刚性棒状装置之间负荷分担特性的比较。
Biomed Mater. 2008 Dec;3(4):044101. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/4/044101. Epub 2008 Nov 25.