Suppr超能文献

当代诊断标准应用中的变异性:以内源性抑郁症为例。

Variability in the application of contemporary diagnostic criteria: endogenous depression as an example.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Coryell W H, Black D W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;147(9):1173-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.9.1173.

Abstract

Specified diagnostic criteria have been credited, in part, with improving diagnostic reliability. The authors hypothesize that nonuniform application of these criteria across different research centers has been one factor responsible for the failure to replicate research findings. For example, researchers using a narrow interpretation of the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) have found a highly significant association between endogenous depression and a positive dexamethasone suppression test result, whereas researchers using a broad interpretation have failed to find the predicted relationship. The authors used two interpretations of the RDC and DSM-III endogenous/melancholia criteria to diagnose 60 depressed patients and found significant difference in rates of diagnoses and symptoms.

摘要

特定的诊断标准在一定程度上被认为有助于提高诊断的可靠性。作者推测,这些标准在不同研究中心的应用不一致是研究结果无法重复的一个原因。例如,对研究诊断标准(RDC)进行狭义解释的研究人员发现,内源性抑郁症与地塞米松抑制试验结果呈阳性之间存在高度显著的关联,而采用广义解释的研究人员则未能发现预期的关系。作者使用RDC和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)的内源性/忧郁症标准的两种解释对60名抑郁症患者进行诊断,发现诊断率和症状存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验