Suppr超能文献

内源性抑郁症的研究诊断标准与地塞米松抑制试验:判别函数分析

The research diagnostic criteria for endogenous depression and the dexamethasone suppression test: a discriminant function analysis.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Stangl D, Coryell W

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 1985 Mar;14(3):197-208. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(85)90014-9.

Abstract

Most studies examining the validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for endogenous depression have been negative. RDC endogenous subtyping is not associated with short- or long-term treatment outcome, family history of affective disorder, or premorbid personality disorder. Studies examining its relationship to the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) are mixed; half report a significant association, and half do not. The RDC endogenous diagnosis may lack validity either because the criteria do not represent, or are not specific to, the endogenous subtype, or the diagnostic algorithm is inappropriate. In the present study, we conduct a discriminant function analysis on the 10 criteria for the endogenous subtype using DST results as the independent variable. We constructed a new diagnostic algorithm and cross-validated it on a second patient sample. In both samples the discriminant function classification was significantly associated with DST results, whereas the RDC algorithm was not.

摘要

大多数检验内源性抑郁症研究诊断标准(RDC)有效性的研究结果均为阴性。RDC内源性亚型分类与短期或长期治疗结果、情感障碍家族史或病前人格障碍均无关联。检验其与地塞米松抑制试验(DST)关系的研究结果不一;一半研究报告存在显著关联,另一半则未发现。RDC内源性诊断可能缺乏有效性,原因要么是其标准不能代表内源性亚型,要么不具有特异性,要么是诊断算法不合适。在本研究中,我们以DST结果作为自变量,对内源性亚型的10项标准进行判别函数分析。我们构建了一种新的诊断算法,并在第二个患者样本上进行交叉验证。在两个样本中,判别函数分类均与DST结果显著相关,而RDC算法则不然。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验