Suppr超能文献

使用患者自控镇痛法对二氢可待因的两种制剂进行评估。

Evaluation of two formulations of dihydrocodeine using patient-controlled analgesia.

作者信息

Aitken H A, Clark E C, McArdle C S, Dimitri W, Kenny G N

机构信息

University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1990 Jul;45(7):535-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14825.x.

Abstract

A randomised, double-blind study of 90 patients after cardiac bypass surgery was undertaken to assess the relative analgesic efficacies of normal- and controlled-release oral dihydrocodeine. Patients received either placebo, normal-release dihydrocodeine, or controlled-release dihydrocodeine at regular intervals on the first to third days after operation. This was supplemented in all groups by intravenous morphine administered on demand by a patient-controlled analgesia system. Morphine requirements in the control group were significantly greater during this 48-hour period than in either of the active groups (p less than 0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two active preparations.

摘要

对90例心脏搭桥手术后的患者进行了一项随机双盲研究,以评估普通释放型和控释型口服二氢可待因的相对镇痛效果。患者在术后第1天至第3天定期接受安慰剂、普通释放型二氢可待因或控释型二氢可待因治疗。所有组均通过患者自控镇痛系统按需静脉注射吗啡进行补充。在这48小时期间,对照组的吗啡需求量显著高于两个活性组中的任何一组(p<0.01),但两种活性制剂之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验