Clinigastro - Criciúma-SC - Brazil.
SIANEST/Hospital Florianópolis, Unidade de Anestesiologia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.032. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Inguinal hernia repair is associated with significant postoperative pain. We assessed the analgesia efficacy of unilateral Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP) performed under ultrasound guidance in patients submitted to open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, comparing ESP to spinal anesthesia administered with or without opioid.
Forty-five patients with ages ranging from 27 to 83 years were randomly allocated into three groups: control group receiving spinal anesthesia (n = 14), ESP group receiving ESP block combined with spinal anesthesia (n = 16), and spinal morphine group receiving spinal anesthesia with morphine 1 mcg.kg as adjuvant drug (n = 15). ESP was performed at the T8 level using 0.5% ropivacaine, 20 mL. We assessed the pain intensity in the initial 24 hours after surgery using the Visual Analogue Scale - VAS and rescue opioid requirement.
The ESP group showed four times higher consumption of rescue opioids than the spinal morphine group, or 26.7% vs. 6.2%, respectively (RR = 4.01; 95% CI: 0.82 to 19.42; p = 0.048). The spinal morphine group showed higher incidence of adverse effects than the ESP group, 37.5% vs. 6.7%, respectively (p = 0.039). There were no statistically significant differences among groups for the mean values of VAS score at 24 hours after surgery (p = 0.304).
At the doses used in this study, the ESP block was an ineffective technique for providing postoperative analgesia in unilateral open inguinal hernioplasty and was associated with higher consumption of rescue opioids when compared to spinal anesthesia with or without opioid.
腹股沟疝修补术后存在明显的疼痛。我们评估了在超声引导下进行单侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESP)对接受单侧开放式腹股沟疝修补术患者的镇痛效果,并将 ESP 与单纯脊髓麻醉或加用阿片类药物的脊髓麻醉进行了比较。
将年龄在 27 岁至 83 岁之间的 45 名患者随机分为三组:接受脊髓麻醉的对照组(n=14)、接受 ESP 阻滞联合脊髓麻醉的 ESP 组(n=16)和接受脊髓麻醉加用吗啡 1mcg.kg 作为辅助药物的脊髓吗啡组(n=15)。ESP 在 T8 水平进行,使用 0.5%罗哌卡因,20mL。我们使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后 24 小时内的疼痛强度,并评估术后镇痛补救药物的需要。
ESP 组比脊髓吗啡组需要更高剂量的术后镇痛补救药物,分别为 4 倍(26.7% vs. 6.2%,RR=4.01;95%CI:0.82 至 19.42;p=0.048)。脊髓吗啡组比 ESP 组出现不良反应的发生率更高,分别为 37.5% vs. 6.7%(p=0.039)。术后 24 小时,三组的 VAS 评分平均值无统计学差异(p=0.304)。
在本研究中使用的剂量下,ESP 阻滞术对单侧开放式腹股沟疝修补术的术后镇痛效果不佳,与单纯脊髓麻醉或加用阿片类药物的脊髓麻醉相比,ESP 阻滞术需要更高剂量的术后镇痛补救药物。