Miscetti G, Barberini L, Chiocchini D, Cirimbilli A, Pippi R, Pampanella L, Caserta G, Gargarella L
Dirigenza Medica Unità Operativa Complessa, Prevenzione e Sicurezza negli Ambienti di Lavoro, ASL 2, Perugia.
Ann Ig. 2011 May-Jun;23(3):219-48.
This study, a collaborative effort among the Local Health Authority 2 of Perugia, Italy, the National Coordination of Worker's Safety Representatives for University and Research Institutions and the National Coordination for Protection and Prevention Services for Universities and Research Institutions, describes the results of a method used to evaluate work-related stress. Personnel from four Italian universities, which we call University I, II, III and IV geographically distributed in nord (1), center (2) and south (1) of Italy, responded to a questionnaire regarding risk evaluation of work-related stress in response to the Italian Law 81/2008. The methodology includes a preliminary analysis of the physical/technological and organizational/relational aspects of the company in order to determine a risk factor of work-related stress. This is followed by an evaluation by agencies competent in the areas of prevention and protection, (Administrative personnel of the company, Medical support persons, heads of the Prevention and Protection Service, employee representatives, and others) that apply a specific algorithm and by the employees through the completion of a questionnaire. The employees, mostly men, of the various universities, completed 510 questionnaires. Based on the results of the questionnaires and on a comparison between the expectations of the administration and the employees, the preventative measures that need to be adopted were identified. The results of this study show that there is not complete agreement between the administration and the employees regarding the work-related expectations. This difference in viewpoints could be a source of work-related stress. Some aspects of the study were shown to be of common concern in the various universities, while for other aspects, there were significantly different perceptions between male and female employees. An immediate response is needed with respect to some aspects in the work context and to plan further investigations where the results are not clear. The method used provides an adequate response to the legislative requirements and labor principles, in evaluating the risk of work related stress. In addition the method allows employees to contribute directly to the evaluation process.
本研究由意大利佩鲁贾地方卫生局2、大学及研究机构工人安全代表国家协调组织以及大学及研究机构保护与预防服务国家协调组织共同开展，描述了一种用于评估工作相关压力的方法的结果。来自意大利四所大学（我们按地理位置将其称为大学I、II、III和IV，分布在意大利北部（1所）、中部（2所）和南部（1所））的人员，针对意大利第81/2008号法律，就工作相关压力的风险评估进行了问卷调查。该方法包括对公司的物理/技术以及组织/关系方面进行初步分析，以确定工作相关压力的风险因素。随后，由预防和保护领域的主管机构（公司行政人员、医疗支持人员、预防和保护服务负责人、员工代表等）应用特定算法进行评估，员工也需填写问卷。各大学的员工（大多数为男性）共完成了510份问卷。根据问卷结果以及管理层与员工期望的对比，确定了需要采取的预防措施。本研究结果表明，管理层与员工在工作相关期望方面并未完全达成一致。这种观点差异可能是工作相关压力的一个来源。研究的某些方面在各所大学中都受到普遍关注，而对于其他方面，男女员工的看法存在显著差异。对于工作环境中的某些方面需要立即做出回应，并在结果不明确的情况下计划进一步调查。所使用的方法在评估工作相关压力风险方面能够充分满足立法要求和劳动原则。此外，该方法允许员工直接参与评估过程。
