• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模人口筛查对美国乳腺癌死亡率的影响。

Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center and Cancer Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven St, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S75-81. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70299-5.

DOI:10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70299-5
PMID:22015298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3457919/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Optimal US screening strategies remain controversial. We use six simulation models to evaluate screening outcomes under varying strategies.

METHODS

The models incorporate common data on incidence, mammography characteristics, and treatment effects. We evaluate varying initiation and cessation ages applied annually or biennially and calculate mammograms, mortality reduction (vs. no screening), false-positives, unnecessary biopsies and over-diagnosis.

RESULTS

The lifetime risk of breast cancer death starting at age 40 is 3% and is reduced by screening. Screening biennially maintains 81% (range 67% to 99%) of annual screening benefits with fewer false-positives. Biennial screening from 50-74 reduces the probability of breast cancer death from 3% to 2.3%. Screening annually from 40 to 84 only lowers mortality an additional one-half of one percent to 1.8% but requires substantially more mammograms and yields more false-positives and over-diagnosed cases.

CONCLUSION

Decisions about screening strategy depend on preferences for benefits vs. potential harms and resource considerations.

摘要

目的

最佳的 US 筛查策略仍存在争议。我们使用六个模拟模型来评估不同策略下的筛查结果。

方法

这些模型纳入了关于发病率、乳房 X 线特征和治疗效果的常见数据。我们评估了每年或每两年开始和停止的不同年龄,并计算了乳房 X 光片、死亡率降低(与不筛查相比)、假阳性、不必要的活检和过度诊断。

结果

从 40 岁开始,乳腺癌死亡的终生风险为 3%,筛查可降低风险。每两年筛查一次可保持 81%(67%至 99%)的年度筛查益处,假阳性更少。从 50 岁到 74 岁每两年筛查一次,可将乳腺癌死亡的概率从 3%降低到 2.3%。从 40 岁到 84 岁每年筛查一次,仅使死亡率再降低半分之一,至 1.8%,但需要进行更多的乳房 X 光检查,并产生更多的假阳性和过度诊断病例。

结论

筛查策略的决策取决于对益处与潜在危害和资源考虑的偏好。

相似文献

1
Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.建模人口筛查对美国乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S75-81. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(11)70299-5.
2
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.不同筛查计划下的乳腺 X 线筛查效果:潜在获益和危害的模型评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010.
3
Collaborative Modeling to Compare Different Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.合作建模比较不同乳腺癌筛查策略:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1947-1960. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24766.
4
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Which strategies reduce breast cancer mortality most? Collaborative modeling of optimal screening, treatment, and obesity prevention.哪些策略能最大程度降低乳腺癌死亡率?最佳筛查、治疗和肥胖预防的协作建模。
Cancer. 2013 Jul 15;119(14):2541-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28087. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
6
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.倾向于支持从 40 岁开始进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查,以评估获益与危害的平衡:风险的比较建模研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):609-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002.
7
Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.美国实施数字乳腺摄影后乳腺癌筛查的获益、危害和成本。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun.
8
Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.乳腺钼靶筛查策略建模的临床结果
Health Rep. 2015 Dec;26(12):9-15.
9
[Population-based breast cancer screening is not worthwhile. Screening has little effect on mortality].基于人群的乳腺癌筛查并不值得。筛查对死亡率几乎没有影响。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(35):A3774.
10
Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening for Women With Down Syndrome: a Collaborative Modeling Study.唐氏综合征女性行乳房 X 线筛查的获益与危害:一项协作建模研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2374-2381. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05182-5. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of optimal strategies for breast cancer screening in Ghana: A simulation study based on a continuous tumor growth model.加纳乳腺癌筛查最佳策略评估:基于连续肿瘤生长模型的模拟研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0323485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323485. eCollection 2025.
2
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
3
Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.全身成像在钝性创伤诊断、电离辐射危害及残余风险中的应用
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Feb;39(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0201-2. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Mammography Screening Among the Elderly: A Research Challenge.老年人的乳腺钼靶筛查:一项研究挑战。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1362.e7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
5
An analysis of mass screening strategies using a mathematical model: comparison of breast cancer screening in Japan and the United States.使用数学模型对大规模筛查策略的分析:日本和美国乳腺癌筛查的比较。
J Epidemiol. 2015;25(2):162-71. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140047. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
6
Construction and analysis of the NCI-EDRN breast cancer reference set for circulating markers of disease.用于疾病循环标志物的美国国立癌症研究所早期检测研究网络乳腺癌参考集的构建与分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Feb;24(2):435-41. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1178. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in Appalachia: does geography matter?阿巴拉契亚地区的乳腺癌筛查、地区贫困和晚期乳腺癌:地理位置重要吗?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):546-67. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12108. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的益处与危害:一项独立综述。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2205-40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.美国预防服务工作组的乳房 X 光筛查建议:被忽视的科学。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609.
2
The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.2009年美国预防服务工作组的指南忽视了重要的科学证据,应该进行修订或撤销。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):15-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100057.
3
When evidence collides with anecdote, politics, and emotion: breast cancer screening.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):531-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00210. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
4
Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds.乳腺癌的乳腺钼靶筛查:来自两个世界的观点。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):166-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1991.
5
The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs.乳腺钼靶筛查的益处与危害:理解利弊权衡。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):164-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2007.
6
The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.美国预防服务工作组2009年乳腺癌筛查建议。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):162-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1989.
7
Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.不同筛查计划下的乳腺 X 线筛查效果:潜在获益和危害的模型评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010.
8
Prostate cancer. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.前列腺癌。美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2004 May;2(3):224-48. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2004.0021.
9
Quality of life valuations of mammography screening.
Qual Life Res. 2008 Jun;17(5):801-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9353-2. Epub 2008 May 20.
10
Adjuvant chemotherapy in oestrogen-receptor-poor breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌的辅助化疗:随机试验的患者水平荟萃分析
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):29-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60069-0.