Luckmann Roger, White Mary Jo, Costanza Mary E, Frisard Christine F, Cranos Caroline, Sama Susan, Yood Robert
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lave Ave. N, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
The optimal form of outreach to promote repeated, on time screening mammograms in primary care has not been established. The purpose of this study is to assess the implementation process and process outcomes for three interventions for promoting biannual screening mammography in a randomized trial. In a large urban primary care practice over a 4-year period, we randomized women aged 40-85 and eligible for mammograms to three interventions: reminder letter only (LO), reminder letter + reminder call (RC), and reminder letter + counseling call (CC). We tracked information system development, staff training, patient and provider recruitment, reach, dose delivered and received, fidelity, and context measures. Ninety-three of 95 providers approved participation by 80% (23,999) of age-eligible patients, of whom only 207 (0.9%) opted not to receive any intervention. Of 9161 initial reminder letters mailed to women coming due or overdue for mammograms, 0.8% were undeliverable. Of women in the RC and CC arms unresponsive to the first reminder letter (n = 3982), 71.4% were called and reached, and of those, 49.1% scheduled a mammogram. Only 33.4% of women reached in the CC arm received full counseling, and women in the CC arm were less likely to schedule a mammogram than those in the RC arm. Implementing mail and telephone mammography reminders is feasible and acceptable in a large urban practice and reaches a majority of patients. Many schedule a mammogram when reached. A reminder letter followed by a simple reminder call if needed may be the optimal approach to promoting screening mammograms.
在初级保健中,尚未确定促进定期、按时进行乳腺钼靶筛查的最佳外展形式。本研究的目的是评估在一项随机试验中,三种促进每半年进行一次乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施的实施过程和过程结果。在一个大型城市初级保健机构中,为期4年,我们将年龄在40 - 85岁且符合乳腺钼靶检查条件的女性随机分为三种干预组:仅提醒信(LO)、提醒信 + 提醒电话(RC)、提醒信 + 咨询电话(CC)。我们跟踪了信息系统开发、工作人员培训、患者和提供者招募、覆盖范围、提供和接收的剂量、保真度以及背景指标。95名提供者中有93名批准了80%(23,999名)符合年龄条件患者的参与,其中只有207名(0.9%)选择不接受任何干预。在寄给应进行或逾期未进行乳腺钼靶检查女性的9161封初始提醒信中,0.8%无法投递。在RC组和CC组中,对第一封提醒信无反应的女性(n = 3982),71.4%接到了电话并联系上,其中49.1%安排了乳腺钼靶检查。CC组中只有33.4%的女性接受了全面咨询,且CC组的女性比RC组的女性安排乳腺钼靶检查的可能性更小。在大型城市医疗机构中实施邮件和电话乳腺钼靶提醒是可行且可接受的,并且能覆盖大多数患者。许多人在接到提醒后安排了乳腺钼靶检查。先寄提醒信,如有需要再进行简单提醒电话,可能是促进乳腺钼靶筛查的最佳方法。