• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测晚期慢性器官衰竭患者对维持生命治疗偏好的变化。

Predicting changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among patients with advanced chronic organ failure.

机构信息

Program Development Centre, CIRO+, Centre of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, The Netherlands; Proteion Thuis, Horn, The Netherlands; CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Program Development Centre, CIRO+, Centre of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Chest. 2012 May;141(5):1251-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1472. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1378/chest.11-1472
PMID:22016488
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For physicians discussing advance care planning with patients with life-limiting illness, it is important to understand the stability of the patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments and the factors that predict a change in preferences. Our objectives were to investigate 1-year stability of preferences regarding CPR and mechanical ventilation (MV) for outpatients with advanced COPD, chronic heart failure (CHF), or chronic renal failure (CRF) and to identify predictors of changes in preferences.

METHODS

In this study, 265 clinically stable outpatients with advanced COPD, CHF, or CRF were visited at baseline and every 4 months for 1 year to assess preferences regarding CPR and MV in their current health status. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between change in life-sustaining treatment preferences and several potential predictors, including changes in comorbidities, hospital admissions, generic health status, care dependency, mobility, and symptoms of anxiety or depression.

RESULTS

The 1-year follow-up period was completed by 77.7% of the patients. Preferences regarding CPR or MV changed in 38.3% of the patients during the follow-up period. Changes over time in generic health status, mobility, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and marital status were associated with changes in life-sustaining treatment preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of outpatients with advanced COPD, CHF, or CRF change their preferences regarding CPR and/or MV at least once during 1 year. Regular reevaluation of advance care planning is necessary, in particular when patients experience a change in health status, mobility, symptoms of anxiety or depression, or marital status.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Netherlands National Trial Register; No.: NTR 1552; URL: http://www.trialregister.nl.

摘要

背景

对于讨论临终关怀计划的医生来说,了解患者对维持生命治疗的偏好的稳定性以及预测偏好变化的因素非常重要。我们的目的是调查患有晚期 COPD、慢性心力衰竭(CHF)或慢性肾衰竭(CRF)的门诊患者对心肺复苏(CPR)和机械通气(MV)的偏好 1 年稳定性,并确定偏好变化的预测因素。

方法

在这项研究中,265 名临床稳定的晚期 COPD、CHF 或 CRF 门诊患者在基线和 1 年内每 4 个月接受一次访问,以评估他们在当前健康状况下对 CPR 和 MV 的偏好。广义估计方程用于检查生活维持治疗偏好变化与几个潜在预测因素之间的关联,包括合并症、住院、一般健康状况、护理依赖、移动性和焦虑或抑郁症状的变化。

结果

77.7%的患者完成了 1 年的随访期。在随访期间,38.3%的患者对 CPR 或 MV 的偏好发生了变化。一般健康状况、移动性、焦虑和抑郁症状以及婚姻状况随时间的变化与维持生命治疗偏好的变化有关。

结论

超过三分之一的晚期 COPD、CHF 或 CRF 门诊患者在 1 年内至少改变了一次对 CPR 和/或 MV 的偏好。需要定期重新评估预先护理计划,特别是当患者的健康状况、移动性、焦虑或抑郁症状或婚姻状况发生变化时。

试验注册

荷兰国家试验注册处;编号:NTR 1552;网址:http://www.trialregister.nl。

相似文献

1
Predicting changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among patients with advanced chronic organ failure.预测晚期慢性器官衰竭患者对维持生命治疗偏好的变化。
Chest. 2012 May;141(5):1251-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1472. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
2
Instability of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatments in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During 1 Year.晚期慢性器官衰竭患者在1年内接受维持生命治疗意愿的不稳定性
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1081-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
One-year stability of care dependency in patients with advanced chronic organ failure.晚期慢性器官衰竭患者的护理依赖程度的一年稳定性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Feb;15(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Dynamic preferences for site of death among patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, or chronic renal failure.晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性心力衰竭或慢性肾衰竭患者对死亡地点的动态偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Dec;46(6):826-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
A call for high-quality advance care planning in outpatients with severe COPD or chronic heart failure.呼吁在患有严重 COPD 或慢性心力衰竭的门诊患者中进行高质量的预先护理计划。
Chest. 2011 May;139(5):1081-1088. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1753. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
6
Patient-Clinician Communication About End-of-Life Care in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During One Year.一年内晚期慢性器官衰竭患者临终关怀方面的医患沟通
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jun;49(6):1109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
7
Family caregiving during 1-year follow-up in individuals with advanced chronic organ failure.晚期慢性器官衰竭患者1年随访期间的家庭照护
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):734-44. doi: 10.1111/scs.12204. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
The association of depression and preferences for life-sustaining treatments in veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病退伍军人中抑郁与维持生命治疗偏好的相关性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Feb;41(2):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Stability of end-of-life preferences in relation to health status and life-events: A cohort study with a 6-year follow-up among holders of an advance directive.生命末期偏好的稳定性与健康状况和生活事件的关系:一项在持有预立指示者中进行的具有 6 年随访的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 18;13(12):e0209315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209315. eCollection 2018.
10
Families' and physicians' predictions of dialysis patients' preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments in Japan.日本家庭和医生对透析患者在维持生命治疗方面偏好的预测。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jan;47(1):122-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.09.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Factors Associated With Thoughts Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment for Oneself and Family Members.与对自己及家庭成员维持生命治疗的想法相关的社会心理因素
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):646-654. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0032. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Adolescents and young adults with cancer conversations following participation in an advance care planning video pilot.青少年和青年癌症患者参与预先护理计划视频试点后的对话。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 17;32(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08372-y.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis and a Structured COVID Unit on Physician Behaviors in Code Status Ordering.
COVID-19 公共卫生危机和结构化 COVID 病房对医生在医嘱状态排序方面行为的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep;41(9):1076-1084. doi: 10.1177/10499091231204943. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis.医疗保健专业人员和老年患者对急性医院环境中治疗升级规划共同决策的看法:一项系统综述和定性主题综合分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 10;62:102144. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102144. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
The Functional and Psychosocial Consequences of COPD.COPD 的功能和社会心理后果。
Respir Care. 2023 Jul;68(7):914-926. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10542.
6
Escalation to intensive care for the older patient. An exploratory qualitative study of patients aged 65 years and older and their next of kin during the COVID-19 pandemic: the ESCALATE study.老年患者转入重症监护病房。COVID-19 大流行期间 65 岁及以上患者及其家属的探索性定性研究:ESCALATE 研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Apr 1;52(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad035.
7
The Impact of Anxiety and Depression in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.焦虑和抑郁对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影响。
Adv Respir Med. 2023 Mar 10;91(2):123-134. doi: 10.3390/arm91020011.
8
Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy.生活质量与生活数量:超越二分法
Palliat Med Rep. 2023 Jan 19;4(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2022.0058. eCollection 2023.
9
End-of-Life Care Preferences of Older Patients with Multimorbidity: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.患有多种疾病的老年患者的临终护理偏好:一项混合方法的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 29;10(1):91. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010091.
10
COVID-19: guidance on palliative care from a European Respiratory Society international task force.COVID-19:欧洲呼吸学会国际工作组关于姑息治疗的指南。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 3;56(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02583-2020. Print 2020 Sep.