German Institute for International Educational Research Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 12;2:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00257. eCollection 2011.
Many studies suggest that age differences in a variety of cognitive tasks are due to age-related changes in executive control processes. However, not all executive control processes seem to be age-sensitive. Recently, Verhaeghen et al. (2005) described dissociable age effects in an executive control process responsible for the switching of representations between different functional units of working memory. This so called focus-switching process has two components: (1) the switching of representations from an activated part of long-term memory into a region of immediate access (focus of attention) and (2) the maintenance of representations outside the focus of attention. Age-related deficits occurred in maintaining representations outside the focus of attention, but were absent in switching representations into and out of the focus of attention (e.g., Dorbath and Titz, 2011). In the present study we applied a training approach to examine age-related differences in the trainability of maintenance and switching. We investigated 85 younger (age 19-35, M = 24.07, SD = 3.79) and 91 older (age 59-80, M = 66.27, SD = 4.75) adults using a continuous counting task in a pretest-training-posttest design. The participants were assigned to one of four training conditions differing in the demand to switch or to maintain. The results suggest the influence of training in both components of focus-switching for both, younger and older adults. However, age differences in the amount of training gains were observed. With respect to maintenance the results indicate a compensatory effect of training for older adults who improved their performance to the level of younger adults. With respect to switching, younger adults benefited more from training than older adults. Trainability is thus reduced in older adults with respect to switching, but not for maintenance.
许多研究表明,在各种认知任务中,年龄差异是由于执行控制过程随年龄的变化而产生的。然而,并非所有的执行控制过程都对年龄敏感。最近,Verhaeghen 等人(2005 年)描述了在负责在工作记忆的不同功能单元之间切换表示的执行控制过程中,存在可分离的年龄效应。这个所谓的焦点切换过程有两个组成部分:(1)将表示从长期记忆的激活部分切换到即时访问的区域(注意力焦点),以及(2)维持注意力焦点之外的表示。与年龄相关的缺陷发生在维持注意力焦点之外的表示,而在切换表示进入和离开注意力焦点时则不存在(例如,Dorbath 和 Titz,2011 年)。在本研究中,我们应用了一种训练方法来研究维持和切换的可训练性与年龄的关系。我们使用连续计数任务,在预测试-训练-后测试设计中,调查了 85 名年轻参与者(年龄 19-35 岁,M=24.07,SD=3.79)和 91 名年长参与者(年龄 59-80 岁,M=66.27,SD=4.75)。参与者被分配到四个训练条件之一,这些条件在切换或维持的需求上有所不同。结果表明,训练对年轻和年长参与者的焦点切换的两个组成部分都有影响。然而,在训练收益的数量上观察到了年龄差异。就维持而言,结果表明训练对年长参与者有补偿作用,他们的表现提高到了年轻参与者的水平。就切换而言,年轻参与者比年长参与者从训练中获益更多。因此,在切换方面,年长参与者的可训练性降低,而在维持方面则没有。